caselaw.findlaw.com/us-9th-circuit/1651525.html

Case opinion for US 9th Circuit MUNIZ v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/12-1226.html

Petitioner Young was a part-time driver for respondent United Parcel Service ( UPS). ... must provide similar accommodations to all pregnant workers, irrespective of any other criteria. ... Co. v. Gilbert, 429 U. S. 125, which upheld against a Title VII challenge a company plan that provided .... 327, 42 U. S. C. § 12101 et seq.

law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca8/16-1073/16-1073-2018-05-11.html

May 11, 2018 ... The Eighth Circuit granted rehearing en banc and vacated the panel opinion in Faidley v. United Parcel Serv. of Am., Inc., 853 F.3d 447 (8th Cir.

www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/12-1226

Dec 3, 2014 ... Young v. United Parcel Service, Inc., 707 F.3d 437, 440. In 2002 ... would not permit her to continue working because all drivers must be able to ...

www.law.cornell.edu/women-and-justice/resource/young_v_united_parcel_service_inc

Young v. United Parcel Service Inc. Plaintiff brought a claim of pregnancy discrimination alleging that her employer violated the Pregnancy Discrimination Act by ...