Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motor_Vehicles_Manufacturers_Ass%27n_v._State_Farm_Mutual_Automobile_Insurance_Co.

Motor Vehicles Manufacturers Association v. State Farm, 463 U.S. 29 (1983), is a United States Supreme Court decision concerning regulations requiring passive restraints in cars. In it, the Court struck down an order by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration rescinding regulations that required either airbags or  ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/il-supreme-court/1444173.html

Nov 17, 2005 ... Alternatively, State Farm moved to transfer the cause from Madison County to McLean County, State Farm's principal place of business. ... We granted Allegiance Healthcare Corporation, Allstate Insurance Company, Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Caterpiller, Inc., Country Mutual Insurance Company, ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/ca-court-of-appeal/1245243.html

Nov 2, 2001 ... STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Defendants and Respondents. ... Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal, Paul E.B. Glad, San Francisco, and John L. Williams, for Defendants and Respondents Colonial Penn Auto Insurance and Colonial Penn Madison Insurance Company.

caselaw.findlaw.com/il-court-of-appeals/1153047.html

Apr 9, 2002 ... Christopher K. GRIDLEY, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ... K. Gridley (plaintiff), a resident of Louisiana, filed a putative nationwide class action lawsuit in Madison County, Illinois, against defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm).

law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/kentucky/kyedce/5:2015cv00375/79336/38

Smith et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al, No. 5: 2015cv00375 - Document 38 (E.D. Ky. 2017) case opinion from the Eastern District of Kentucky U.S. Federal District Court.

www.casebriefs.com/blog/law/contracts/contracts-keyed-to-knapp/the-meaning-of-the-agreement-principles-of-interpretation-and-the-parol-evidence-rule/taylor-v-state-farm-mutual-automobile-insurance-co

Facts. This claim arises from a three-car accident involving Plaintiff. Defendant is Plaintiff's automobile insurance provider. Plaintiff received a judgment against him in excess of his policy limits. Plaintiff claims that Defendant acted in bad faith by not settling the claim within the policy limits. Defendant argues that the claim is  ...

www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2212638/van-hulle-v-state-farm-ins/?

44 Ill. 2d 227 (1969). 254 N.E.2d 457. MELVIN VAN HULLE et al., Appellee, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant. No. 41850 .... Phelps County Mutual Ins. Co., 63 Neb. 21, 88 N.W. 142; Continental Ins. Co. v. Chew, II Ind. App. 330, 38 N.E. 417; Joliffe v. Madison Mut. Ins. Co., 39 Wis.