law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/cafc/11-1105/11-1105-2012-08-13.html

Wake Forest is the owner of asserted patents, and KCI are the exclusive licensees of the patents, which claim methods and apparatuses for treating ...

www.knobbe.com/news/2018/01/arthrex-inc-v-smith-nephew-inc

Jan 24, 2018 ... Smith & Nephew and Arthrocare filed an IPR petition on certain claims of ... A PTO regulation, 37 C.F.R. § 42.73(b), states that a disclaimer of all ...

www.leagle.com/decision/infdco20181126685

Nov 19, 2018 ... In re Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) Hip Implant ... Price Benowitz LLP, Alex C. Davis , Jones Ward PLC, pro hac vice, Ashton Rose Smith .... Mary M. Patton, S. Stephen Patton, Rhonda Maestas & Solomon Maestas, ...... in October 2014, case filed in January 2018; (5) Durdon et al. v.

www.mdd.uscourts.gov/sites/mdd/files/Case%20Management%20Order%20No.%207.pdf

Lewis Williams Jr and Angela Williams v. Smith ..... Smith & Nephew, Inc. et al. ..... 1:17-cv-03302 Maestas, Rhonda Rhonda Maestas and Soloman Maestas v.

www.patentdocs.org/2018/02/arthrex-inc-v-smith-nephew-inc-fed-cir-2018.html

Feb 6, 2018 ... ... Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., affirming the PTAB's interpretation of the rule. ... the IPR because all the challenged claims had been disclaimed.

www.cafc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/opinions-orders/17-1389.Opinion.3-12-2018.1.PDF

Mar 14, 2018 ... STOLL, Circuit Judge. Appellant Hologic, Inc. initiated an inter partes reex- amination of U.S. Patent No. 8,061,359, which is owned.

www.justice.gov/criminal-fraud/case/united-states-v-smith-nephew-inc-court-docket-number-12-cr-030-rbw

Jun 9, 2015 ... This matter was announced on February 6, 2012, in the District of Columbia. Related Document(s):. Information · Deferred Prosecution ...