en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Inc._v._Samsung_Electronics_Co.

Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. was the first of a series of ongoing lawsuits between Apple Inc. and Samsung Electronics regarding the design of ...

law.justia.com/cases/california/court-of-appeal/2016/d069713.html

Sep 28, 2016 ... Plaintiffs in this putative class action case, Stacey and Tyler Walker, appealed the trial court's order disqualifying their counsel, Hogue & Belong ...

law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/cafc/2018

Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation v. Apple Inc. Date: September 28, 2018 ..... Martin v. United States Date: July 11, 2018. Docket Number: 17-2224.

regmedia.co.uk/2018/09/28/eastmanvapple.pdf

Sep 27, 2018 ... Plaintiff, vs. APPLE, INC.,. Defendant. Case Number 18CV333181 .... Consolidated World Investments, Inc., v. ... Gelfo v. Lockheed Martin Corp.

www.law.com/therecorder/2018/08/02/apple-hit-with-145m-patent-infringement-verdict

Aug 2, 2018 ... Apple Inc. was hit with a $145 million patent infringement verdict in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California Wednesday over ...

www.cafc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/opinions-orders/15-1171.Opinion.2-24-2016.1.PDF

Feb 26, 2016 ... ment suit and countersuit between Apple Inc. (“Apple”) ... United States software or code capable of implementing ...... M. Martin Co. v. Alliance.

www.cafc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/opinions-orders/17-2102.Opinion.8-16-2018.pdf

Aug 16, 2018 ... CORE WIRELESS LICENSING v. APPLE INC. 3 particular mobile device is assigned specific time slots in which to send or receive data.

www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/FaceTime.pdf

Dec 23, 2016 ... MARTIN WALKER PC. 121 N. Spring .... 20 | times herein mentioned, Defendant APPLE, INC., and DOES 1-20, inclusive, were ... existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of California, or the laws of some. 23.

casetext.com/case/sanders-v-apple-inc

Sanders v. Apple Inc. 672 F. Supp. 2d 978 (N.D. Cal. 2009) Copy Cite ... Apple moves to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12( b)(1) and 12(b)(6) and to strike all of the purported class ..... see also Martin v.