Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schmuck_v._United_States

Schmuck v. United States, 489 U.S. 705 (1989), is a United States Supreme Court decision on criminal law and procedure. By a 5–4 margin it upheld the mail fraud conviction of an Illinois man and resolved a conflict among the appellate circuits over which test to use to determine if a defendant was entitled to a jury ...

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/414/395

United States v. Maze. No. 72-1168. Argued November 13-14, 1973. Decided January 8, 1974. 414 U.S. 395. Syllabus. Respondent was convicted of violating the federal mail fraud statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1341, by devising a scheme to defraud through unlawfully obtaining possession from one Meredith of a credit card issued ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/414/395.html

Case opinion for US Supreme Court UNITED STATES v. MAZE. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.

openjurist.org/468/f2d/529/united-states-v-e-maze

Pereira v. United States, 347 U.S. 1, 8, 74 S.Ct. 358, 98 L.Ed. 435 (1954). A mailing is "caused" by the defendant when he knows that the mails will be used in the ordinary course of business or when he can reasonably foresee such use even if he does not actually intend it. Pereira v. United States, supra, 347 U.S. at 8-9, ...

www.oyez.org/cases/1973/72-1168

United States v. Maze ... Citation. 414 US 395 (1974). Argued. Nov 12 - 13, 1973. Decided. Jan 8, 1974. Advocates. Jewel S. Lafontant Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, for the United States. William T. Warner by appointment by the Court, for the respondent. Sort: by seniority; by ideology. << decision 1 of 1 >>  ...

dspace.creighton.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10504/39806/14_23CreightonLRev97%281989-1990%29.pdf?sequence=1

Id. at 11. This argument was based on United States v. Maze, 414 U.S. 395,. 402- 03 (1974). For a discussion of Maze see infra note 215 and accompanying text. 39. Joint Appendix at 11. The language that a mailing must be "in furtherance" of the scheme appears in neither the mail fraud statute nor in the indictment against.

www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/13pdf/13-316_3204.pdf

Jun 23, 2014 ... See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321, 337. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. Syllabus. LOUGHRIN v. ..... like Loughrin's. One of the decisions prompting enact- ment of the bank fraud law, United States v. Maze, 414. U. S. 395 (1974), involved a defendant who used a ...

cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2016/02/17/14-30132.pdf

Feb 17, 2016 ... FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,. Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CORY MICHAEL EGLASH,. Defendant-Appellant. No. 14-30132 ..... term in the statute meaningless. The Court in Schmuck distinguished, and did not overrule,. United States v. Maze.10. Maze is still good law.11. Maze,.

www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4241424/maze-v-internal-revenue-service

Jul 25, 2016 ... Opinion for Maze v. Internal Revenue Service. ... UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA EVA MAZE, et al., Plaintiffs v. ... United States v. Bisceglia, 420 U.S. 141 , 145 (1975); see also Florida Bankers Ass'n v. U.S. Dep't of the Treasury, 799 F.3d 1065 , 1073 (D.C. Cir.