www.scotusblog.com/2008/02/argument-preview-exxon-v-baker

Feb 25, 2008 ... Baker, et al., is known "“ and will always be known popularly "“ as a case ... and wind and water spread it over a 600-mile area in the midst of a ...

www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/07-219.pdf

Jun 25, 2008 ... ET AL. v. BAKER ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT .... EXXON SHIPPING CO. v. BAKER. Syllabus need to revisit the figure selected. ...... legislative enactments for policy guidance.” Miles v. Apex Marine.

www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/554/471

EXXON SHIPPING COMPANY, et al., PETITIONERS v.GRANT BAKER et al. .... Miles v. Apex Marine Corp., 498 U. S. 19, 36 (1990) . For that reason, when we ...

www.oyez.org/cases/2016/15-457

Microsoft v. Baker. Media. Oral Argument - March 21, 2017 ... Respondent. Seth Baker, et al. Location. United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ...

dockets.justia.com/docket/nevada/nvdce/3:2019cv00161/136052

4 days ago ... Prisoner: Civil Rights case filed on March 22, 2019 in the Nevada District Court.

www.nssf.org/judge-kavanaugh-confirmation-hearings-near-potential-gun-related-cases-reach-supreme-court

Aug 23, 2018 ... Worman, et. al, v. Baker: This case in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit challenges on Second Amendment grounds Massachusetts' ...

law.emory.edu/elj/content/volume-59/issue-3/comments/exxon-shipping-baker-perils-punitive-damages-reform.html

Baker, the U.S. Supreme Court held that punitive damages for reckless conduct should ...... 2004, at 50, 51 (“Although Miles did not address punitive damages ...

www.dbmslaw.com/all-matters

PLAINTIFF V. DEFENDANT PHYSICAL THERAPIST, ET AL.02/15/2016. Client: Defendant .... Miles v. Defendant Obstetrician01/27/2009. Client: Defendant Obstetrician ... Baker v. Defendant Physician03/01/2007. Client: Defendant Physician.

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/554/471.html

Jun 25, 2008 ... ET AL. v. BAKER ET AL.. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw. ... Miles v. Apex Marine Corp., 498 U. S. 19, 36 (1990). For that reason ...