Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Miller

United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939), was a Supreme Court case that involved a Second Amendment challenge to the National Firearms Act of 1934 ( NFA). Miller is often cited in the ongoing American gun politics debate, as both sides claim that it supports their position.

www.oyez.org/cases/1900-1940/307us174

An Arkansas federal district court charged Jack Miller and Frank Layton with violating the National Firearms Act ("NFA") when they transported a sawed-off double-barrel 12-gauge shotgun in interstate commerce. In part, Miller and Layton argued that the NFA violated their Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms.

www.oyez.org/cases/1900-1940/307us433

Petitioner. Rolla W. Coleman et al. Respondent. Clarence W. Miller et al. ... Under Article V of the Constitution, three-fourths of state legislatures must ratify an amendment passed by Congress before it becomes part of the Constitution. Initially, the Kansas state legislature rejected the amendment, but in January 1937 it was ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/425/435.html

Case opinion for US Supreme Court UNITED STATES v. MILLER. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw. ... 26 U.S.C. 5179, 5205, 5601 et seq.; 18 U.S.C. 371. .... In Hoffa v. United States, 385 U.S. 293, 301 -302 (1966), the Court said that "no interest legitimately protected by the Fourth Amendment" is implicated by  ...

www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/307/174

307 U.S. 174. United States v. Miller (No. 696). Argued: March 30, 1939. Decided : May 15, 1939. 26 F.Supp. 1002, reversed. Syllabus; Opinion, Mcreynolds. Syllabus. The National Firearms Act, as applied to one indicted for transporting in interstate commerce a 12-gauge shotgun with a barrel less than 18 inches long ...

www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2012/2012-ohio-2928.pdf

Jul 3, 2012 ... MILLER ET AL., APPELLEES, v. MILLER, APPELLANT. Cite as Miller v. Miller, 132 Ohio St.3d 424, 2012-Ohio-2928.] Corporations—Directors—R.C. 1701.13(E )—Corporation's duty to advance expenses to director for costs incurred in litigation to which director is party by reason of position with ...

www.aclupa.org/our-work/legal/legaldocket/milleretalvskumanick

Miller, et al v. Skumanick. Teenage girls threatened with child pornography for cell phone photos of themselves. Court/Assoc.: US District Court, Middle District. Attorneys/Firms: Witold Walczak, Sara Rose, and Valerie Burch (ACLU of Pennsylvania); Seth Kreimer (University of Pennsylvania School of Law). The American ...

www.encyclopediaofarkansas.net/encyclopedia/entry-detail.aspx?entryID=4742

Dec 4, 2015 ... United States v. Miller et al. originated in the U.S. District Court, Western District of Arkansas, Fort Smith Division when a federal grand jury indicted two men for transporting a sawed-off shotgun from Oklahoma to Arkansas in violation of a federal firearm statute. The case eventually became the single ...

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/515/900

MILLER ET AL. v. JOHNSON ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA. No. 94-631. Argued April 19, 1995-Decided June 29, 1995*. In Shaw v. Reno, 509 U. S. 630, this Court articulated the equal protection principles that govern a State's drawing of ...