Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Miller

United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939), was a Supreme Court case that involved a Second Amendment challenge to the National Firearms Act of 1934 ( NFA). Miller is often cited in the ongoing American gun politics debate, as both sides claim that it supports their position.

www.oyez.org/cases/1900-1940/307us174

An Arkansas federal district court charged Jack Miller and Frank Layton with violating the National Firearms Act ("NFA") when they transported a sawed-off double-barrel 12-gauge shotgun in interstate commerce. In part, Miller and Layton argued that the NFA violated their Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms.

www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/307/174

307 U.S. 174. United States v. Miller (No. 696). Argued: March 30, 1939. Decided : May 15, 1939. 26 F.Supp. 1002, reversed. Syllabus; Opinion, Mcreynolds. Syllabus. The National Firearms Act, as applied to one indicted for transporting in interstate commerce a 12-gauge shotgun with a barrel less than 18 inches long ...

www.shmoop.com/right-to-bear-arms/united-states-v-miller.html

Shmoop: United States v. Miller, US government study guide. United States v. Miller analysis by PhD and Masters students from Stanford, Harvard, Berkeley. ... In 1934, Congress, in an effort to crack down on the machine guns and sawed-off shotguns commonly used by notorious gangsters like Al Capone, had passed the  ...

www.encyclopediaofarkansas.net/encyclopedia/entry-detail.aspx?entryID=4742

Dec 4, 2015 ... United States v. Miller et al. originated in the U.S. District Court, Western District of Arkansas, Fort Smith Division when a federal grand jury indicted two men for transporting a sawed-off shotgun from Oklahoma to Arkansas in violation of a federal firearm statute. The case eventually became the single ...

en.wikisource.org/wiki/Judith_Miller_v._US,_Matthew_Cooper_and_Time_Inc._v._US

May 9, 2005 ... MATTHEW COOPER AND TIME INC., PETITIONERS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ..... Matthew Cooper et al., A War on Wilson?, TIME.com (July 17, 2003 ), available at http://wwwtime.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,465270,00.html. In addition, on September 28, 2003, the Washington Post reported that, ...

www.justice.gov/crt/file/851296/download

May 4, 2016 ... UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,. Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SAMUEL MULLET, SR. (15 -3212); LESTER MULLET. (15-3231); LEVI MILLER (15-3232); ANNA MILLER. ( 15-3237); JOHNNY S. MULLET (15-3246); EMANUEL. SCHROCK (15-3247); RAYMOND MILLER (15-3249);. KATHRYN MILLER (15-3250); ...

migration.nyulaw.me/sites/default/files/ECM_PRO_060964.pdf

The Peculiar Story of U.S. v. Miller. 49 shotgun, so the police arrested them for violating the National Fire- arms Act (“NFA”). Surprisingly, the district court dismissed the charges, holding the NFA violates the Second Amendment.1 The. Supreme Court reversed in United States v. Miller,2 holding the Sec- ond Amendment ...

www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/11pdf/10-9646g2i8.pdf

Jun 25, 2012 ... See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321, 337. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. Syllabus. MILLER v. ALABAMA. CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL ... est sentences on juvenile offenders, even when they commit terrible crimes. While Graham's flat ban on life  ...