Citation(s), [1998] AC 214, [1997] 3 WLR 909, [1997] 4 All ER 568, [1998] Lloyd's Rep Bank 48, [1997] BCC 965, [1998] 1 BCLC 68. Case opinions. Lord Hoffmann . Keywords. Security interest, bank account. Re Bank of Credit and Commerce International SA (No 8) [1998] AC 214 is a UK insolvency law ... In an earlier case , In re Charge Card Services Ltd Millett J had said it was ...


Welcome to the Hernandez, et al. v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc., et al. Website. Important Update: On May 7, 2018, a notice was filed to appeal the ...


White, et al. v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. Class Action. Back to cases. Case Type: Consumer & Product. Judge Name: David O. Carter. Industry:.


Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al. Date: December 7, 2012. Docket Number: 0:2012cv61360. Government Employees Insurance Company v. Prushansky


... v. Unknown Railroad Company et al ... v. Experian Information Solutions Inc et al ... Cox v. Executive Office of US Attorneys et al ... v. Johnson & Johnson et al ...


report, the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) entitled Millet to receive a .... et al. as Amici Curiae Supporting Petitioners, Reynolds v. Hartford Fin ..... Experian Info.


Jun 17, 2015 ... Request for Information Regarding the Credit Card Market ..... an IRS Form 1099- C stating that all or part of a debt is cancelled, ..... Consumerinfo.com d/b/a Experian Consumer Direct for deceptive ... 73 See, e.g., Millett v.


Sorting: click on Argument Date or Case Number to sort by date or case number. ...... Experian Information Solutions, Robert B. King, Dennis W. Shedd, Stephanie D. Thacker ..... Halah Al-Rawaf, J. Harvie Wilkinson III, William B. Traxler Jr., Bruce H. ...... Motz, Robert B. King, G. Steven Agee, William Mauck Jr., Patricia Millett.


Mar 2, 2007 ... In response, Daccach presented alternate choice of law analyses all of which directed .... Id. This analysis arms the court with information necessary to determine if questions of law or fact common to the ...... Experian Info. ... "later [be told] that they had impermissibly split a single cause of action"); Millett v.