Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aronow_v._United_States

Aronow v. United States was the first case to challenge the inclusion of "In God We Trust" on U.S. currency. The law it challenged was "31 U.S.C. § 324a "the inscription 'In God we Trust'...shall appear on all United States currency and coins ". In 1970, Stefan Ray Aronow having been found without standing to sue by the ...

www.justice.gov/atr/case/us-and-plaintiff-states-v-american-express-co-et-al

Nov 10, 2016 ... United States of America, State of Arizona, State of Connecticut, State of Idaho, State of Illinois, State of Iowa, State of Maryland, State of Michigan, State of Missouri, State of Montana, State of Nebraska, State of New Hampshire, State of Ohio, Sta... Case Type: Civil Non-Merger. Case Violation:.

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/351/40/case.html

Frozen Food Express v. United States, 351 U.S. 40 (1956). Frozen Food Express v. United States. No. 158. Argued March 7, 1956. Decided April 23, 1956*. 351 U.S. 40. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED .... 161, Akron, Canton & Youngstown R. Co. et al. v. Frozen Food Express et al., also on appeal from the same court.

www.leagle.com/decision/infdco20160119b32

Jan 14, 2016 ... KELSEY CASCADE ROSE JULIANA; et al., Plaintiffs, v. The UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; et al., Defendants. United ... Sahara V., Plaintiff, represented by Julia A. Olson , Wild Earth Advocates, Philip L. Gregory , Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP & Daniel M. Galpern , Law Offices of Daniel M. Galpern.

www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/16-1454-opinion-below.pdf

25 Klein et al., supra note 5, at 572. 26 For a graphical depiction of this system, see infra Addendum Figure 3. 27 Amex occasionally uses third-party banks as issuers. At the present time, nine third- party banks issue Amex cards, accounting for roughly one percent of Amex's total U.S. charge volume per year. 28 For a ...

www.siebman.com/Representative-Clients.shtml

McWane Cast Iron, et al. Weatherly v. Home Interiors, et al. Anderson v. Ford Motor Company. de Blanc, et al v. Farmers Ins Exchange. Tompkins, et al v. Life Care Centers, et al. Musica Adelena v. Capitol Records Inc, et al. Parental Guide of TX v. Funai Corp Inc, et al. Nickerson, et al v. USA, et al. Phillips, et al v. Ford Motor ...

www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2013/2013-ohio-3019.pdf

Jul 16, 2013 ... United Tel. Co. of Ohio, 136 Ohio St.3d 231, 2013-Ohio-3019.] STAMMCO, L.L.C. , ET AL., APPELLEES, v. UNITED TELEPHONE COMPANY OF ... but only for the purpose of determining whether the plaintiff has satisfied the prerequisites of Civ. R. 23. (Wal-Mart Stores,. Inc. v. Dukes, 564 U.S. ___, 131 S.Ct.

ipfs.io/ipfs/QmXoypizjW3WknFiJnKLwHCnL72vedxjQkDDP1mXWo6uco/wiki/National_Socialist_Party_of_America_v._Village_of_Skokie.html

Full case name, National Socialist Party of America et al. v. Village of ... Collin; sometimes referred to as the Skokie Affair), was a United States Supreme Court case dealing with freedom of assembly. ... The challengers argued that the injunction violated the First Amendment rights of the marchers to express themselves.

www.law.cornell.edu/supct/justices/stevens.dec.html

Writings by Justice Stevens. grouped by type, in alphabetical order by first party name. [ Opinions | Concurrences | Dissents | Concur in part, dissent in part ]. Opinions. 44 LIQUORMART, INC., et al. v. RHODE ISLAND et al. , 517 U.S. 484 ( 1996), 05/13/96; A.G. BAKER, Jr., et al., Appellants v. GENERAL MOTORS ...