Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitchell_v._United_States

Mitchell v. United States, 526 U.S. 314 (1999) is a United States Supreme Court case that considered two Fifth Amendment privileges related to a criminal defendant's rights against self-incrimination in a Federal District Court. First, does a defendant who waives the guilty plea also waive the privilege during the sentencing ...

www.oyez.org/cases/1998/97-7541

Amanda Mitchell and others were indicted for offenses arising from a conspiracy to distribute cocaine. Mitchell was charged with one count of conspiring to distribute five or more kilograms of cocaine. Mitchell pleaded guilty, but reserved the right to contest the drug quantity attributable to her under the conspiracy count ...

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/526/314

OCTOBER TERM, 1998. Syllabus. MITCHELL v. UNITED STATES. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 97-7541. Argued December 9, 1998-Decided April 5, 1999. Petitioner pleaded guilty to federal charges of conspiring to distribute five or more kilograms of ...

www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/97-7541.ZO.html

Id., at 189. The court acknowledged other Circuits have held a witness can “claim the Fifth Amendment privilege if his or her testimony might be used to enhance his or her sentence,” id., at 190 (citing United States v. Garcia, 78 F.3d 1457, 1463, and n. 8 (CA10), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1239 (1996)), but it said this rule “ does ...

www.casebriefs.com/blog/law/criminal-procedure/criminal-procedure-keyed-to-israel/sentencing-procedures/mitchell-v-united-states

Citation. Mitchell v. United States, 526 U.S. 314, 119 S. Ct. 1307, 143 L. Ed. 2d 424, 1999 U.S. LEXIS 2348, 67 U.S.L.W. 4230, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Service 2468,

www.quimbee.com/cases/mitchell-v-united-states

From our private database of 13,300+ case briefs... Mitchell v. United States. United States Supreme Court 267 U.S. 341 (1925). Facts. Acting under statutory authorization, the United States (defendant) acquired land in Maryland from several landowners, including Mitchell (plaintiff), because it was necessary for military use.

caselaw.findlaw.com/dc-court-of-appeals/1681424.html

Oct 23, 2014 ... A Napue claim invokes the Due Process Clause and arises when a conviction is obtained through the government's use of false evidence. See supra, 360 U.S. at 269. As we recently had occasion to set forth in Longus v. United States, 52 A.3d 836, 845 (D.C.2012):. Napue claims are reviewed de novo and, ...

www.justice.gov/osg/brief/mitchell-v-us-merits

Oct 21, 2014 ... AMANDA MITCHELL, PETITIONER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT BRIEF FOR THE UNITED STATES OPINION BELOW The opinion of the court of appeals (J.A. 112-128) is reported at 122 F.3d 185.

www.ask.com/youtube?q=Mitchell+v.+United+States+of+America&v=LeDP9DbKnqI
Aug 13, 2013 ... In this video clip from the "Proof of Facts" CLE on GardenStateCLE.com, Joseph P. Rem, Jr., certified criminal trial attorney, breaks down Mitchell v. United States, 526 U.S. 314 (1999). Joe discusses plea bargaining, the differences for attorneys between federal court work and state court work, and 5th ...