Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitchell_v._United_States

Mitchell v. United States may refer to. Mitchell v. United States (1863), 96 U.S. 162 · Mitchell v. United States (1874), 88 U.S. 350 · Mitchell v. United States ( 1925), 267 U.S. 341 · Mitchell v. United States (1941), 313 U.S. 80, concerning the racial integration of transport · Mitchell v. United States (1962), 368 U.S. 439 · Mitchell ...

www.oyez.org/cases/1998/97-7541

Before accepting her plea, the District Court told Mitchell that she faced a mandatory minimum of 1 year in prison for distributing cocaine and a 10-year minimum for conspiracy if the government could show the required 5 kilograms. The court also explained to Mitchell that by pleading guilty she would be waiving her right "at ...

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/526/314

OCTOBER TERM, 1998. Syllabus. MITCHELL v. UNITED STATES. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 97-7541. Argued December 9, 1998-Decided April 5, 1999. Petitioner pleaded guilty to federal charges of conspiring to distribute five or more kilograms of ...

www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/97-7541.ZO.html

Id., at 189. The court acknowledged other Circuits have held a witness can “claim the Fifth Amendment privilege if his or her testimony might be used to enhance his or her sentence,” id., at 190 (citing United States v. Garcia, 78 F.3d 1457, 1463, and n. 8 (CA10), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1239 (1996)), but it said this rule “ does ...

www.casebriefs.com/blog/law/criminal-procedure/criminal-procedure-keyed-to-israel/sentencing-procedures/mitchell-v-united-states

Citation. Mitchell v. United States, 526 U.S. 314, 119 S. Ct. 1307, 143 L. Ed. 2d 424, 1999 U.S. LEXIS 2348, 67 U.S.L.W. 4230, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Service 2468,

caselaw.findlaw.com/dc-court-of-appeals/1010457.html

The issues before us are whether the police violated Mitchell's Fourth Amendment rights in the course of his roadside detention, and whether the police violated Mitchell's Fifth Amendment rights by interrogating him without complying with the requirements of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed .2d 694 ...

www.quimbee.com/cases/mitchell-v-united-states-526-u-s-314-1999

During the guilty plea, the district court advised Mitchell that she was waiving her Fifth Amendment right to remain silent at trial by pleading guilty. When asked if she had committed the acts necessary to be found guilty, Mitchell responded, “ Some of it.” At the sentencing hearing, the United States government (plaintiff) offered ...

www.encyclopediaofarkansas.net/encyclopedia/entry-detail.aspx?entryID=6277

Nov 13, 2014 ... Mitchell v. United States et al., 313 U.S. 80 (1941), came on appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, challenging discriminatory treatment of railroad accommodations for African-American passengers on interstate train coaches passing through Arkansas, where a state law demanded segregation of races but ...

www.ask.com/youtube?q=Mitchell+v.+United+States+of+America&v=LeDP9DbKnqI
Aug 13, 2013 ... In this video clip from the "Proof of Facts" CLE on GardenStateCLE.com, Joseph P. Rem, Jr., certified criminal trial attorney, breaks down Mitchell v. United States, 526 U.S. 314 (1999). Joe discusses plea bargaining, the differences for attorneys between federal court work and state court work, and 5th ...