Premo v. Moore, 562 U.S. 115 (2011), is a United States Supreme Court case involving the right of individuals to federal habeas corpus relief on state-law claims. In a unanimous ruling, the court held that habeas relief may not be granted with respect to any claim a state-court has found on the merits unless the state-court ...
Nov 7, 2001 ... Case opinion for US 9th Circuit MAYFIELD v. WOODFORD. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.
Jul 28, 2008 ... See Solis v. Garcia, 219 F.3d 922, 926 (9th Cir.2000). Moore's federal habeas petition was filed after April 24, 1996, and is therefore governed by the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (“AEDPA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Woodford v. Garceau, 538 U.S. 202, 210, 123 S.Ct. 1398, 155 L.Ed.2d 363 (2003 ) ...
Aug 15, 2014 ... the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments. The district court granted Moore relief on this ground, Moore, 861 F. Supp. 2d at 1207–08, and the State appealed . II. This Court reviews a district court's decision to grant or deny a habeas petition de novo. Aguilar v. Woodford,. 725 F.3d 970, 972 (9th Cir. 2013).
May 5, 1992 ... According to Caldwell, Sutherland told him that he didn't need to see a doctor, but Sutherland agreed to inform Chief Jailer James Moore about Caldwell's request. The day following his request to Sutherland, Caldwell was taken to the Woodford County Hospital where he was examined by a doctor.
Facts. Plaintiff Rueben Moore sued Defendant Sidney Moore for custody of their child. Defendant answered and the matter came to trial on October 20, 1976. Defendant then filed a motion to conform the pleadings to the evidence. Defendant sought to assert a counterclaim for custody, child support, separate maintenance, ...
Aug 15, 2017 ... RealClearPolitics - Election 2017 - Alabama Senate Special Election - Moore vs. Jones.