Department of Agriculture v. Moreno, 413 U.S. 528 (1973), was a United States Supreme Court case that declared a provision of the Food Stamp Act denying food stamps to households of "unrelated persons" to be a violation of the U.S. Constitution. The Court held that provision to be irrelevant to the stated purpose of the ...
United States Dept. of Agriculture v. Moreno, 413 U.S. 528 (1973). United States Department of Agriculture v. Moreno. No. 72-534. Argued April 23, 1973. Decided June 25, 1973. 413 U.S. 528. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Syllabus. Section 3(e) of the Food ...
Citation. United States Dep't of Agric. v. Moreno, 413 U.S. 528, 93 S. Ct. 2821, 37 L. Ed. 2d 782, 1973 U.S. LEXIS 33 (U.S. June 25, 1973) Brief Fact.
Apr 23, 1973 ... Jacinta Moreno lived with Ermina Sanchez, who was not related, and Sanchez's three children. Sanchez provided care to Moreno, who contributed to household living expenses. Moreno satisfied the income requirements for the federal food stamp program, but was denied under Section 3 of the Food ...
May 11, 2006 ... United States v. Moreno Jr., No. 04-0698/MC. 2. Judge ERDMANN delivered the opinion of the court. Corporal Javier A. Moreno Jr. was tried by general court- martial for the offense of rape in violation of Article 120,. Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 920 (2000). Moreno entered a plea of ...
Case opinion for VA Court of Appeals MORENO v. MORENO. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.
Case opinion for US Supreme Court US DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE v. MORENO. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.
A summary and case brief of U.S. Dept. of Agriculture v. Moreno, including the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, key terms, and concurrences and dissents.
The Maryland District Court and U.S. Supreme Court found, in a prior proceeding Elkins v. Moreno (1978), that the denial of in-state status rested on a “not universally true” irrebuttable presumption that a G-4 alien cannot establish domicile in Maryland. The Maryland Court of Appeals concluded, however, that nothing in the ...