Morris v. United States, 174 U.S. 196 (1899), is a 5-to-2 ruling by the United States Supreme Court which held that the bed under the Potomac River between the District of Columbia and the Commonwealth of Virginia belonged to the United States government rather than nearby private landowners on the District of ...
U.S. Supreme Court. Morris v. United States, 174 U.S. 196 (1899). Morris v. United States. No. 49. Argued October 26, 27, 28, 31, November 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 1898. Decided May 1, 1899. 174 U.S. 196. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT. OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Syllabus. The grant by Charles I to Lord Baltimore ...
Morris A. Kent, Jr., Appellant, v. United States of America, Appellee, 401 F.2d 408 (D.C. Cir. 1968) case opinion from the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.
U.S. Supreme Court. Morris v. Slappy, 461 U.S. 1 (1983). Morris v. Slappy. No. 81 -1095. Argued December 1, 1982. Decided April 20, 1983. 461 U.S. 1. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR. THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Syllabus. When respondent was charged in California Superior Court with ...
View this case and other resources at: Citation. 928 F.2d 504, 1991 U.S. App. 3682. Brief Fact Summary. Defendant Morris was charged under the.
Fulminante, 499 U.S. 279, 287, 111 S.Ct. 1246, 113 L.Ed.2d 302 (1991); Reid v. United States, 581 A.2d 359, 363 (D.C.1990). Indeed, our overall scrutiny must reflect the reality that we are dealing here with alleged violations of Morris' constitutional rights. See, e.g., Griffin v. United States, 618 A.2d 114, 118 (D.C. 1992).
Case opinion for US 1st Circuit UNITED STATES v. MORRIS. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.
Precedential Status: Precedential. Citations: 343 F.2d 247. Docket Number: 17935. 343 F.2d 247. Morris A. KENT, Jr., Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. No. 17935. United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit. Argued December 17, 1963. Decided October 26, 1964. Order January 22, 1965.
In February 2005, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled that disgorgement of illegal profits, a remedy aimed at past violations, is not a valid remedy since ... U.S.A. v. Philip Morris USA, Inc., et al.: Analysis of Judge Kessler's Final Opinion and Order, Sara Guardino et al, Tobacco Control Resource Center (2007).