Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Corp._v._Motorola_Inc.

Microsoft Corp. v. Motorola Inc., 696 F.3d 872 (9th Cir. 2012) was a United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit case about Reasonable and Non- Discriminatory (RAND) Licensing and foreign anti-suit injunction. The case was originally filed by Microsoft against Motorola in the Western District Court of Washington at ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-9th-circuit/1709142.html

Jul 30, 2015 ... MICROSOFT CORPORATION, a Washington corporation, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. MOTOROLA, INC.; Motorola Mobility, Inc.; General Instrument Corporation, Defendants–Appellants.

www.essentialpatentblog.com/2015/07/ninth-circuit-affirms-judge-robarts-rand-decision-microsoft-v-motorola

Jul 31, 2015 ... Yesterday, the Ninth Circuit court of appeals issued a decision affirming Judge Robart's RAND decision in the much watched Microsoft v. ... Commission (FTC) announced a consent decree agreement with Google/Motorola (Google having acquired Motorola Mobility in 2012) where Motorola agreed to a ...

www.cornerstone.com/Microsoft-Corporation-v-Motorola

Microsoft Corporation v. Motorola, Inc. et al. Counsel for Microsoft retained Cornerstone Research and Vice President Matthew Lynde to estimate the value and range of royalties that would be consistent with Motorola Mobility's contractual obligations to license its patented standards on reasonable and nondiscriminatory ...

law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca9/12-35352/12-35352-2012-09-28.html

In this interlocutory appeal, Motorola appealed from the district court's preliminary injunction to enjoin Motorola temporarily from enforcing a patent injunction that it obtained against Microsoft in Germany. The underlying case before the district court concerned how to interpret and enforce patent-holders' commitments to ...

www.law360.com/articles/685661/3-takeaways-from-9th-circ-s-motorola-frand-decision

Jul 30, 2015 ... By affirming Thursday that Motorola Inc. failed to license its standard-essential patents to Microsoft Corp. on fair terms, the Ninth Circuit endorsed the detailed process the trial judge devised for setting royalty rates for essential patents. Here are three things attorneys can learn from the decision.

ipkitten.blogspot.com/2015/08/microsoft-vs-motorola-us-court-grants.html

Aug 4, 2015 ... Microsoft was a third party beneficiary entitled to rely on these contracts ( Microsoft Corp. v Motorola, Inc.,Motorola Mobility, Inc., and Gen. Instrument Corp, 696 F.3d 872 [2012]). Microsoft sought damages in connection with Motorola's German injunction (which was never enforced), notably the cost for the ...

www.patentprogress.org/cases/microsoft-v-motorola-inc-and-motorola-mobility-inc-w-d-of-wa

Microsoft v. Motorola, Inc. and Motorola Mobility, Inc. Court: Western District of Washington. Date Updated:01/23/13. Judge: James L. Robart ... November 10, 2010 – Motorola (and its wholly-owned subsidiary General Instrument Corporation) files Complaint against Microsoft in the Western District of Wisconsin Case No.

www.wired.com/images_blogs/gadgetlab/2012/12/microsoft_v_motorola.pdf

v. MOTOROLA, INC., et al.,. Defendants. CASE NO. C10-1823JLR. ORDER GRANTING. MICROSOFT'S MOTION. DISMISSING MOTOROLA'S. CLAIM FOR INJUNCTIVE. RELIEF. MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC., et al.,. Plaintiffs, v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION,. Defendant. Case 2:10---cv---01823---JLR Document 607 Filed ...