Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Robinson

United States v. Robinson, 414 U.S. 218 (1973), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that "in the case of a lawful custodial arrest a full search of the person is not only an exception to the warrant requirement of the Fourth Amendment, but is also a reasonable search under that Amendment." ...

law.justia.com/cases/missouri/supreme-court/1976/59167-0.html

The receipt of such benefits by Paul Carron would be relevant if recovery were sought under an implied agency theory. Cf. Dierks & Sons Lumber Co. v. Morris, 404 S.W.2d 229 (Mo.App. 1966); Kaufmann v. Krahling, 519 S.W.2d 29 (Mo.App. 1975); Murphy v. Olds, 508 S.W.2d 249 (Mo.App.1974); E. C. Robinson Lumber Co.

www.landlordsguild.com/no-breach-of-repairing-obligation-until-notice-and-reasonable-time

Sep 21, 2009 ... The landlord's obligation in relation to property in the possession of the tenant is not an undertaking to prevent them ever getting out of repair during the continuance of the tenancy; it is an undertaking to do work of repair on the premises from time to time as and when they have become out of repair.

caselaw.findlaw.com/ca-supreme-court/1498121.html

Jan 25, 2010 ... Case opinion for CA Supreme Court PEOPLE v. ROBINSON. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.

openjurist.org/613/f2d/1151/murphy-v-department-of-army

2. Noel Anketell Kramer, Asst. U. S. Atty., Washington, D. C., with whom Earl J. Silbert, U. S. Atty., Washington, D. C., at the time the brief was filed, John A. Terry, Peter E. George and A. Patricia Froham, Asst. U. S. Attys., Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellees. 3. Before LEVENTHAL* and ROBINSON, Circuit  ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/414/218.html

Last Term in Cupp v. Murphy, 412 U.S. 291, 295 (1973), we again reaffirmed the traditional statement of the authority to search incident to a valid arrest. Thus the broadly stated rule, and the reasons for it, have been repeatedly affirmed in the decisions of this Court since Weeks v. United States, supra, nearly 60 years ago.

eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A61986CJ0157

61986J0157. Judgment of the Court of 4 February 1988. - Mary Murphy and others v An Bord Telecom Eireann. - Reference for a preliminary ruling: High Court - Ireland. - Equal pay for men and women. - Case 157/86. European Court reports 1988 Page 00673. Swedish special edition Page 00349. Finnish special edition ...

scocal.stanford.edu/opinion/murphy-v-e-r-squibb-sons-inc-28459

Dec 30, 1985 ... Murphy v. E. R. Squibb & Sons, Inc. (1985) 40 Cal.3d 672 , 221 Cal.Rptr. 447; 710 P.2d 247. [L.A. No. 31970. Supreme Court of California. December 30 ...... 4047.6.) FN 5. In Robinson v. Northern American Life & Cas. Co. (1963) 215 Cal. App.2d 111, 117 [30 Cal.Rptr. 57], the term "substantial" was defined ...

www.cambridge.org/download_file/view/909243

In Robinson v PE Jones (Contractors) Ltd, 12 Jackson LJ remarked that Murphy is 'seen by many (myself included) as returning to the orthodox and principled basis of tortious liability for negligently-inflicted harm, as formulated by the House of Lords in Donoghue v Stevenson'. In the same case, Stanley Burnton LJ noted ...