Web Results

www.law360.com/articles/875040

Dec 20, 2016 ... The individual cases are Andrews v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc. et al., case number 3:15-cv-03484; Davis v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc. et al., case ...

www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/24613618/Kathleen_Grassini_v_DePuy_Orthopaedics,_Inc_et_al

2 days ago ... Kathleen Grassini v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al (3:18-cv-01333), Texas Northern District Court, Filed: 05/24/2018 - PacerMonitor Mobile ...

www.lexisnexis.com/legalnewsroom/litigation/b/litigation-blog/archive/2014/10/24/defense-verdict-returned-in-1st-depuy-pinnacle-hip-bellwether-case.aspx

Oct 24, 2014 ... 3:11-md-2244, Kathleen Herlihy-Paoli v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., et al., No. 12- 2975, N.D. Texas). (Charge and verdict form available.

www.theenergylawblog.com/2017/09/articles/litigation/the-fifth-circuits-decision-in-in-re-depuy-orthopaedics-inc-et-al-illustrates-the-possibility-that-even-when-you-lose-a-writ-of-mandamus-you-may-still-win

Sep 8, 2017 ... Faced with the prospect of having to defend another costly test-case trial in a multidistrict litigation proceeding involving over 9000 plaintiffs, the ...

www.in.gov/judiciary/opinions/pdf/04241501mm.pdf

Apr 24, 2015 ... Plaintiffs Travis Brown et al. filed suit against DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. in Marion ... From 2005 to 2010, DePuy sold a prosthetic hip implant.

45ijagbx6du4albwj3e23cj1-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/depuy-pinnacle-master-case-list.pdf

Jul 1, 2014 ... Cox v. Depuy Inc et al. 7/16/2010. 3 3:11-cv-00125-K. Shirilla v. Johnson & Johnson ... 11 3:11-cv-01183-K. Toth v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al. California . Northern. 4:11-cv-01728 ...... Nichols et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics ...

www.depuysynthes.com/json?amid=MEDIA_BIN_AJAX&mbid=1DSUSJRC04172128

DePuy Synthes, examined the impact of THA using the. Anterior Approach on ... control group to be discharged home (87% vs. 69%;. P<0.0001). ... discontinue walker, discontinue all gait aids, discontinue narcotics ..... orthopaedic table was incorporated into the analysis based on a .... Source: Adapted from Nichols et al.

www.psblaw.com/landmark-cases.html

Anderson v. GM. $58 Million. Griggs v. Caterpillar, et al. $55.4 Million. Lampe v. Continental General Tire ... $8.3 Million. Kransky v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.