en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Ortiz

United States v. Ortiz, 422 U.S. 891 (1975), was a United States Supreme Court case in which ... In an argument before the Supreme Court, the Government, represented by Mark L. Evans and assisted by the Solicitor General Bork, argued that ...

www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/ortiz-v-united-states

Holding: Military judge Colonel Martin Mitchell's simultaneous service on an Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals and the Court of Military Commission Review ...

www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/17pdf/16-1423_bq7c.pdf

Jun 22, 2018 ... ORTIZ v. UNITED STATES. Syllabus problem with the assignment, the .... tions of, ” certain “civil office[s]” in the federal government, “[e]xcept.

www.lawfareblog.com/summary-supreme-court-rules-ortiz-v-united-states

Jun 23, 2018 ... United States that Judge Martin Mitchell could simultaneously serve as a judge ... (The Supreme Court consolidated Ortiz's case with two other cases, Cox v. ... the functions of,” certain “civil office[s]” in the federal government.

www.oyez.org/cases/2017/16-1423

Jun 22, 2018 ... United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces ... A judge convicted Keanu Ortiz of possessing and distributing child pornography, and ...

harvardlawreview.org/2018/11/ortiz-v-united-states

Nov 9, 2018 ... Federal Courts. Ortiz v. United States .... CCA, the CAAF held that the government had the better case on both fronts and denied Ortiz's appeal.

www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/16-1423

Jun 22, 2018 ... SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. Syllabus. Ortiz v. ..... Both the Federal Government and Ortiz view that grant of jurisdiction as ...

ballotpedia.org/Ortiz_v._United_States

Ballotpedia: The Encyclopedia of American Politics. ... Ortiz v. United States was a case argued during the October 2017 term of the U.S. Supreme Court.

constitutionallawreporter.com/2018/07/24/ortiz-v-united-states-2018

Jul 24, 2018 ... In Ortiz v United States (2018), SCOTUS affirmed the legality of a military ... the functions of,” certain “civil office[s]” in the federal government.