en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coram_nobis

The writ of coram nobis is a legal order allowing a court to correct its original judgment upon ..... In 1954, the Supreme Court determined in United States v. .... We do not think that the enactment of § 2255 is a bar to this motion, and we hold ...... the House of Lords in Jonesco v Beard [1930] AC 298; ^ Noble v Owens [ 2010] 1 ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-1st-circuit/1455567.html

Finally, we review a district court's denial of a § 2255 petition de novo as to legal ... Owens v. United States, 236 F.Supp.2d 122, 144 (D.Mass.2002). Further ...

casetext.com/case/owens-v-united-states-14

affirming the district court's denial of the petitioner's § 2255 motion and noting that , although a disputed factual issue ordinarily cannot be decided based only on ...

casetext.com/case/us-v-owens-101

We affirmed his convictions on direct appeal in United States v. Owens ... Before ruling on Owens' motion for § 2255 relief, the United States Magistrate held an ...

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/488/235

U.S. Supreme Court. Owens v. Okure, 488 U.S. 235 (1989). Owens v. Okure. No. 87-56. Argued November 1, 1988. Decided January 10, 1989. 488 U.S. 235.

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/484/554

U.S. Supreme Court. United States v. Owens, 484 U.S. 554 (1988). United States v. Owens. No. 86-877. Argued November 4, 1987. Decided February 23, 1988.

law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca11/17-11531/17-11531-2018-05-03.html

May 3, 2018 ... Emile Myrthil v. USA, No. 17-11531 (11th Cir. 2018) case opinion from the US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.

cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2015/01/23/14-71696.pdf

Jan 23, 2015 ... v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,. Respondent. No. 14-71696. OPINION. Application to File ... John B. Owens, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge ... 2255(h) to file a second or successive petition presents a complex issue, this ...

www.justice.gov/crt/appellate-briefs-and-opinions-1

Metcalf v. United States (S. Ct.) - Respondent. The court of appeals' decision does ...... and the district court correctly determined Owens' Guidelines offense level .... since a motion under 28 U.S.C. 2255 would be premature while his appeal is ...