Web Results

benefitslink.com/src/ctop/Perez_v_Brain_CDCal_07252016.pdf

Jul 25, 2016 ... Thomas E. Perez v. Scott Brain, et al. CV-90 (10/08). CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL . Page 2 of 71. Defendants for retaliation against Rice and ...

www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/perez-v-mortgage-bankers-association

Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Association. Linked with: Nickols v. Mortgage ... Aug 20 2014, Brief of petitioners Thomas E. Perez, Secretary of Labor, et al. filed.

caselaw.findlaw.com/fl-district-court-of-appeal/1664285.html

Osmany Anthony PEREZ, etc., et al., Appellants, v. BELL SOUTH ... Mark R. Boyd , Scott A. Markowitz, and Mary M. Schneider (Fort Lauderdale), for appellees.

www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/17-586.html

v. Shannon Perez, et al. Docketed: October 19, 2017. Linked with 17A825. Lower Ct .... For appellants: Scott A. Keller, Solicitor General of Texas, Austin, Tex.

www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/crt/legacy/2012/10/05/perezperrysectionfive.pdf

Oct 5, 2012 ... should order into effect all or part of the same redistricting plan that has failed to receive preclearance. Texas misreads Upham v. Seamon, 456 ...

www.leagle.com/decision/infdco20170313h23

Mar 10, 2017 ... Shannon Perez, Plaintiff, represented by Luis Roberto Vera, Jr. , Law Offices of ..... Office of the Attorney General & Scott A. Keller , Office of the Attorney General. ..... All three members of this Court agreed with this reasoning.

law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca9/15-16430/15-16430-2018-02-09.html

Feb 9, 2018 ... Judge Tashima concurred on the basis that the defendants' reasons for firing the officer all arose in such short order after the internal affairs ...

www.lovingday.org/perez-v-sharp

Perez v. Sharp (1948) | Loving Day ... ANDREA D. PEREZ et al., Petitioners, v. ..... on grounds similar to those set forth in the frequently cited case of Scott v.

scocal.stanford.edu/opinion/perez-v-sharp-26107

ANDREA D. PEREZ et al., Petitioners, v. ..... justifies the prohibition of miscegenation on grounds similar to those set forth in the frequently cited case of Scott v.