Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bank_Markazi_v._Peterson

The financial assets described in this section are the financial assets that are identified in and the subject of proceedings in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in Peterson et al. v. Islamic Republic of Iran et al., Case No. 10 Civ. 4518 (BSJ) (GWG), that were restrained by restraining notices ...

scocal.stanford.edu/opinion/peterson-v-superior-court-banque-paribas-31536

Peterson v. Superior Court (Banque Paribas) (1995) 10 Cal.4th 1185 , 43 Cal. Rptr.2d 836; 899 P.2d 905. [No. S029736. Aug 21, 1995.] NADINE L. PETERSON et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, Respondent; BANQUE PARIBAS et al., Real Parties in Interest. (Opinion by George, J., ...

www.leagle.com/decision/198335158ny2d2931322

Plaintiff, Joseph Murphy, was first employed by defendant, American Home Products Corp., in 1957. He thereafter served in various accounting positions, eventually attaining the office of assistant treasurer, but he never had a formal contract of employment. On April 18, 1980, when he was 59 years old, he was discharged.

www.leagle.com/decision/1989814113wn2d7011767

Nov 30, 1989 ... AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS CORPORATION, ET AL, Respondents. The Supreme .... Young v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 112 Wn.2d 216 , 770 P.2d 182 ( 1989). So here, only a pharmacist who knew the practice and standard of care in this state could establish the standard of care for the defendants.

www.druganddevicelawblog.com/2014/07/innovator-liability-at-100.html

Jul 18, 2014 ... The Alabama legislature was forced to act because, in a long and awful opinion that ignored much of the law cited in this post, the Alabama Supreme Court .... In Sheeks v. American Home Products Corp., 2004 WL 4056060, at *1-2 (Colo. Dist. Oct. 15, 2004), the court rejected innovator liability. Connecticut.

www.albanylawreview.org/Articles/Vol77_1/77.1.0047%20Hamid.pdf

Mar 6, 2014 ... Martin, has held firm for over one hundred years.12. The modern version of the at -will doctrine was detailed in a 1983. Court of Appeals case, Murphy v. American Home Products Corp. In that case, the plaintiff, Joseph Murphy, had worked for defendant company, American Home Products, for over twenty.

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-7th-circuit/1673706.html

Jul 24, 2014 ... AMERICAN CYANAMID CO., et al., Defendants–Appellees. ... Unfortunately, the paint applied to that house contained white lead carbonate pigment. ... The paint was applied to Gibson's home sometime before 1978, which is when the Consumer Products Safety Commission banned paint makers from ...

www.iadclaw.org/assets/1/7/Rafferty_v._Merck__Co._-_Brief_for_Amicus_Curiae_IADC_(Oct._10_2017).pdf

Oct 10, 2017 ... Foster v. American Home Products Corp.,. 29 F.3d 165 (4th Cir. .... Ramos v. Brenntag. Specialties, Inc., et al., No. 8218176 (Cal.); Tincher v. Omega Flex, Inc., No. 17 MAP 2013 (Pa.); and T.H.,. A Minor, ETC., et al., v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals ..... stream of commerce”); Peterson v. Lou Bachrodt. Chevrolet  ...

www.opn.ca6.uscourts.gov/case_reports/rptPendingDistrict_MIW.pdf

David Morton v. Bank Of America Home Loans, et al. 17-2241 nr. Eddie Jackson v. USA. 17-2256 bbr. New Products Corporation, et al. v. Dickinson Wright PLLC, et al. 17-2258 awsub. New Products Corporation v. Thomas Tibble, et al. 17- 2259 awsub. USA v. Nathan Osborne. 17-2266 bbr. Carl Jones v. Willie Smith, et al.