Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashcroft_v._Iqbal

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that top government officials were not liable for the actions of their subordinates absent evidence that they ordered the allegedly discriminatory activity. At issue was whether current and former federal officials, including ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/556/662.html

United States Supreme Court. ASHCROFT, FORMER ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL. v. IQBAL ET AL., (2009). No. 07-1015. Argued: December 10, 2008 Decided: May 18, 2009. Following the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, respondent Iqbal, a Pakistani Muslim, was arrested on criminal charges and detained by ...

ccrjustice.org/home/what-we-do/our-cases/arar-v-ashcroft-et-al

Sep 21, 2015 ... Arar v. Ashcroft was a federal lawsuit challenging the rendition to torture of Canadian citizen Maher Arar by U.S. government officials. Mr. Arar was detained at JFK airport in September 2002 while on his way home to Canada from abroad. He was interrogated, detained for two weeks, denied access to a ...

www.leagle.com/decision/20021143195fsupp2d94811055

Apr 3, 2002 ... DETROIT FREE PRESS v. ASHCROFT. Email | Print | Comments (0). Nos. 02- 70339, 02-70340, 02-70605. View Case; Cited Cases · Citing Case. 195 F.Supp. 2d 948 (2002). DETROIT FREE PRESS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. John ASHCROFT, et al., Defendants. Rabih Haddad Plaintiff, v. John Ashcroft, et al.

www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/15-1358-opinion-below.pdf

Turkmen, et al. v. Hasty, et al. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS. 1. FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. 2. 3. 4. August Term, 2013. 5. 6. (Argued: May 1, 2014 .... proceed, inter alia, the substantive due process and equal protection claims. 9 challenging the conditions of confinement at the MDC. See Turkmen v. Ashcroft. 10.

www.internationalcrimesdatabase.org/Case/74/Arar-v-Ashcroft

Feb 16, 2006 ... ... the Eastern District of New York, United States. Case number, Civil Action No. CV-04-0249. Decision title, Memorandum and Order. Decision date, 16 February 2006. Parties. Maher Arar; John Ashcroft et al. Categories, Terrorism. Keywords, Al Qaeda, Civil rights, Extraordinary rendition, Terrorism, torture.

www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/07-1015

Dec 10, 2008 ... After pleading guilty and being deported to Pakistan, Iqbal filed a civil complaint in federal court, based largely on Bivens v. .... According to Barr et. al., if dismissal is not available to the defendants, high-ranking government officials will “face the prospect of discovery proceedings that are highly likely to ...

www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/osg/briefs/2016/06/01/15-1359_ashcroft_v._turkmen_pet._app.pdf

Jun 1, 2016 ... In the Supreme Court of the United States. JOHN D. ASHCROFT, FORMER ATTORNEY GENERAL. OF THE UNITED STATES, AND ROBERT MUELLER,. FORMER DIRECTOR OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU. OF INVESTIGATION, PETITIONERS v. IBRAHIM TURKMEN, ET AL. ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF ...

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/556/662

ASHCROFT, FORMER ATTORNEY GENERAL, et al. v. IQBAL et al. certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the second circuit. No. 07–1015. Argued December 10, 2008—Decided May 18, 2009. Following the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, respondent Iqbal, a Pakistani Muslim, was arrested on criminal ...