Web Results

www.cafc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/opinions-orders/15-1919.Opinion.2-13-2017.1.PDF

Feb 15, 2017 ... Xilinx is a Delaware corporation that is headquar- tered in San ... XILINX, INC. v. PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG. 3 consumer products, and it has always had fewer than 30 employees.” J.A. 1133. Xilinx points to various Papst marketing .... Altera Corporation (“Altera”) was also a party to this appeal.

www.law360.com/articles/741081/fed-circ-urged-to-overturn-patent-jurisdiction-law

Dec 22, 2015 ... The briefs support an appeal by two California companies, Altera and Xilinx, that received letters in 2014 from Papst Licensing GmbH and Co. demanding that they cease infringing a patent ... The friends of the court want the Federal Circuit to use the case to revisit a 1998 decision, Red Wing Shoe Co. v.

companyprofiles.justia.com/company/altera

Altera legal profile including 121 Trademarks, 3909 Patent Grants, 455 Patent Applications, 70 Federal Litigation Filings, 49 Federal District Court Decisions and 8 State Court Decisions.

www.patentdocs.org/2017/02/xilinx-inc-v-papst-licensing-gmbh-co-kg-fed-cir-2017.html

Feb 19, 2017 ... Personal Jurisdiction Exists Due to Warning Letters and Prior Litigations in Forum By Joseph Herndon -- Establishing personal jurisdiction in the United States over a company operating in a foreign country can be difficult. How does a U.S. company protect itself in its home state when threatened with patent ...

www.eff.org/files/2015/12/22/professors_amicus_-_altera_v_papst.pdf

Dec 21, 2015 ... ALTERA CORPORATION, XILINX, INC.,. Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG,. Defendant-Appellee. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern. District of California in Nos. 5:14-cv-04794 and 5:14-cv-. 04963, Judge Lucy H. Koh. BRIEF OF THIRTY-FOUR LAW ...

blogs.orrick.com/iplandscape/2015/07/23/dont-get-personal

Jul 23, 2015 ... Xilinx, Inc. v. Papst Licensing GMBH & Co. KG (Judge Lucy Koh) (July 9, 2015). The Supreme Court's 2014 ruling in Daimler v. Bauman raised the bar to establish personal jurisdiction over a defendant. Daimler has made it substantially more difficult for a foreign corporation to be haled into US courts.

www.bzbm.com/attorney/w-paul-schuck

Xilinx, Inc. v. Papst Licensing GMBH & Co.KG; Altera Corporation v. Papst Licensing GMBH & Co. (N.D. Cal.). Mr. Schuck was co-counsel representing a German defendant in declaratory judgment actions regarding patent invalidity and non-infringement. The court dismissed all claims in favor of his client after granting a ...

www.researchgate.net/publication/314555815_Brief_of_Thirty-Four_Law_Professors_as_Amici_Curiae_in_Support_of_Appellants_in_Altera_Corp_v_Papst_Licensing_Gmbh

Jan 2, 2018 ... Brief of Thirty-Four Law Professors as Amici Curiae in Support of Appellants in Altera Corp. v. Papst Licensing Gmbh. Article · January ... for the Federal Circuit. ALTERA CORPORATION, XILINX, INC.,. Plaintiffs-Appellants,. v. PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG,. Defendant-Appellee. Appeals from the ...

insight.rpxcorp.com/lit/txedce-164635-papst-licensing-gmbh-co-kg-v-apple

Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. Apple, Inc. 6:15-cv-01095; Filed: 11/30/2015; Case Updated Daily; Latest Docket Entry: 01/04/2018; PACER. ×. Litigation Campaign Assessments ...