Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2015_term_per_curiam_opinions_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States

The Supreme Court of the United States handed down eighteen per curiam opinions during its 2015 term, which began October 5, 2015 and concluded October 2, 2016. Because per curiam decisions are issued from the Court as an institution, these opinions all lack the attribution of authorship or joining votes to specific ...

law.justia.com/cases/virginia/supreme-court/2016/150454.html

In 2014, the trustee under a deed of trust conveyed the Parrish property to the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae), which sent the Parrishes a notice to vacate and filed a summons for unlawful detainer in the general district court. The Parrishes alleged that the foreclosure was invalid because their deed of ...

law.justia.com/cases/california/supreme-court/2017/s228277.html

Aug 10, 2017 ... The interim adverse judgment rule applies when a trial court had initially denied summary judgment on the basis that a lawsuit had sufficient potential merit to proceed to trial but concluded after trial that the suit had been brought in bad faith because the claim lacked evidentiary support.

law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/texas/txsdce/4:2016cv01414/1360805/125

ODonnell v. Harris County, Texas et al, No. 4:2016cv01414 - Document 125 (S.D. Tex. 2016) case opinion from the Southern District of Texas US Federal District Court.

www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/15pdf/14-232_ihdj.pdf

Apr 20, 2016 ... See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321, 337. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. Syllabus. HARRIS ET AL. v. ARIZONA INDEPENDENT. REDISTRICTING COMMISSION ET AL. ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR. THE DISTRICT OF ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/ca-court-of-appeal/1706058.html

Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 3, California. William PARRISH et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. LATHAM & WATKINS et al., Defendants and Respondents. B244841. Decided: June 26, 2015. Eagan Avenatti, Michael J. Avenatti and Scott H. Sims; Panish, Shea & Boyle, Brian J. Panish, Adam K. Shea and Kevin ...

www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/09pdf/08-586.pdf

Mar 30, 2010 ... JONES ET AL. v. HARRIS ASSOCIATES L. P.. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR. THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 08–586. Argued November 2, 2009—Decided March 30, 2010. Petitioners, shareholders in mutual funds managed by respondent in- vestment adviser, filed this ...

www.oyez.org/cases/1999/98-1167

Does the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 prohibit a public employer from compelling its employees to use their compensatory time without a preexisting agreement?

www.oyez.org/cases/2016/15-1262

Dec 5, 2016 ... 5–3 decision for Harris, et al. majority opinion by Elena Kagan. The district court did not error in determining that North Carolina's new districting plan constituted an unconstitutional racial gerrymander, and neither claim nor issue preclusion based on the state court case dictate the outcome of this case.