Web Results

www.casebriefs.com/blog/law/intellectual-property-law/intellectual-property-keyed-to-merges/trademark-law/johnson-johnson-merck-consumer-pharmaceuticals-co-v-smithkline-beecham-corp

Facts. Smithkline Beecham Corp. (Defendant) produced the antacid TUMS. It started a television advertising campaign that compared the ingredients in TUMS to competing products. Merck (Plaintiff), the maker of MYLANTA, claimed that the advertisement falsely represented the occasional ingestion of TUMS resulted in ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-3rd-circuit/1452077.html

Case opinion for US 3rd Circuit UNITED STATES MERENA v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-11th-circuit/1520753.html

Apr 6, 2010 ... Case opinion for US 11th Circuit SCHAAF v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.

scocal.stanford.edu/opinion/dowhal-v-smithkline-beecham-33399

v. ) Ct.App. 1/5. A094460 SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CONSUMER ) HEALTHCARE et al., San Francisco County Defendants and Respondents. ) Super. Ct. No. 305893 .... manufactures NicoDerm CQ, and Costco Wholesale Corporation, Lucky Stores, Inc., Rite Aid ..... (Brock v. Pierce County (1986) 476 U.S. 253, 263.) 14 ...

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/567/11-204/opinion3.html

MICHAEL SHANE CHRISTOPHER, et al., PETITION- ERS v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION dba GLAXOSMITHKLINE. on writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit. [June 18, 2012]. Justice Alito delivered the opinion of the Court. The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) imposes  ...

www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-204

Jun 18, 2012 ... The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) requires employers to pay employees overtime wages, see 29 U. S. C. §207(a), but this requirement does not apply with respect to workers employed “in the capacity of outside salesman,” §213(a)( 1). Congress did not elaborate on the meaning of “outside salesman,” ...

www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/merrill-lynch-pierce-fenner-smith-inc-v-manning

Holding: The jurisdictional test established by Section 27 of the federal Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is the same as the test of the general federal-question statute, Section 1331, for deciding if a case "arises under" a federal law. Judgment: Affirmed, 8-0, in an opinion by Justice Kagan on May 16, 2016. Justice Thomas ...

www.minnesotalawreview.org/2015/06/defying-auer-deference-skidmore-solution-conservative-concerns-perez-v-mortgage-bankers-association

Jun 24, 2015 ... DEFYING AUER DEFERENCE: SKIDMORE AS A SOLUTION TO CONSERVATIVE CONCERNS IN PEREZ v. .... SmithKline Beechman Corp. in a way that restricted the application of Auer deference. The Court held that .... SmithKline Beecham focuses on the merits of the case rather than Auer deference.

judiciary.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Pierce-Testimony-Supplement.pdf

612 (1996). 68 E.G. Gates & Fox Co. v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, 790 F. 2d 154, 56 (D. C.. Cir. 1986), cited favorably in Christopher v. SmithKline Beecham Corp., 132 S. Ct. 2156, 2166-67.(2012). 69 Christopher v. SmithKline Beecham Corp. 132 U.S. at 2166-67. 70 Id. at 2166-67. 71 Id. at 2169.