Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holt_v._Hobbs

Holt v. Hobbs, 574 U.S. ___ (2015), was an American legal case in which the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that an Arkansas prison policy which prohibited a Muslim prisoner from growing a short beard in accordance with his religious beliefs violated the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA).

e-lawresources.co.uk/Pitts-v-Hunt.php

Pitts v Hunt [1990] 3 All ER 344 Court of Appeal The Claimant, Mr Pitts (aged 18), and Mr Hunt (aged 16), were friends. They had been out for an evening together. Mr Hunt gave the Claimant a lift on the back of his trial motorbike which was a Suzuki 250cc. He had no licence to ride the bike on the road, indeed the engine ...

www.defensebasecomp.com/decisions.html

Case Decisions. From the Liberation of Iraq and Afghanistan. David Newton Sealey v. Armor Group (2015); Jeffrey Athey v. Dyncorp (2015); (1) Robert Hobbs v. Service Employees International Inc. (2015); (2) Robert Hobbs v. Service Employees International, Inc. (2015); Brian Strum v. Dyncorp International (2015); Linda ...

law.justia.com/cases/texas/court-of-criminal-appeals/1979/56429-3.html

In Hobbs v. State, 548 S.W.2d 884 (Tex.Cr.App.1977), we held the following language insufficient: "That Joyce Hobbs on or about the 25th day of July, A.D. .... In Pitts v. State, 569 S.W.2d 898 (Tex.Cr. App.1978), an indictment for the offense of attempted capital murder was held sufficient when it alleged that the defendant :.

law.justia.com/cases/arkansas/supreme-court/2013

Docket Number: CR-13-713. Justia Opinion Summary: Appellant entered a negotiated plea of guilty to rape. Appellant subsequently filed a pro se petition for writ of error coram nobis, alleging that his guilty plea was coerced and that the prosecution did not provide him... Pitts v. Hobbs (Per Curiam) Date: November 7, 2013

caselaw.findlaw.com/ar-supreme-court/1655668.html

Jan 23, 2014 ... Although Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, is the nominal party, we will identify appellant as the “State.” 5. Parole eligibility is determined by the law in effect at the time the crime is committed. Pitts v. Hobbs, 2013 Ark. 457, at 4 (per curiam). 6. We recognize that parole was technically ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/tx-court-of-appeals/1590554.html

Dec 29, 2011 ... Case opinion for TX Court of Appeals PITTS COLLARD v. SCHECHTER. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2002JD002352/pdf

Peter V. Hobbs,1 Parikhit Sinha,1 Robert J. Yokelson,2 Ted J. Christian,2 Donald R. Blake,3. Song Gao,4 Thomas W. ... Citation: Hobbs, P. V., P. Sinha, R. J. Yokelson, T. J. Christian, D. R. Blake, S. Gao, T. W. Kirchstetter, T. Novakov, and. P. Pilewskie ...... $(2–10) В 106 molecules cmА3 [Finlayson-Pitts and. Pitts, 2000].

courts.arkansas.gov/courts/supreme-court/oral-argument-videos/sc

CV-17-240, Larry Walther, Director, Arkansas Department of Finance and Administration v. FLIS Enterprises, from Pulaski County Circuit Court, .... CR-80- 40, Eugene Pitts v. State of Arkansas, from Pulaski Circuit Court. .... James Grubbs and CV-14-470 Ray Hobbs, Director v. Aaron Hodge, from Lee County Circuit Court.