Web Results

citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.380.8648&rep=rep1&type=pdf

between 1 and IO pM. The semilog plot in Figure 1A tends to overemphasize these small changes. Note that although. Sampath and Pollard en. A. Barbedend ... of plots of rate versus actin concentration at both ends of the filament (Figure 3, Table I). This confirms the observations of Dancker et al. (1975), Estes et al. ( 1981) ...

www.law360.com/cases/5106ee6bc7fad2356c000001

Parties, docket activity and news coverage of federal case Pollard v. Remington Arms Company, LLC et al, case number 4:13-cv-00086, from Missouri Western Court.

law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/384/304/1370708

384 F. Supp. 304 (1974). Charlie W. POLLARD et al., Plaintiffs, Carrie Bell Griffin, Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. The UNITED STATES of America et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 4126-N. United States District Court, M. D. Alabama, N. D.. October 31, 1974. *305 *306 Fred D. Gray, Gray, Seay & Langford, Tuskegee, Ala., and Jack ...

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2141646

Monitoring actin polymerization by intermolecular cross-linking with 1,4-PBM was carried out as described by Millonig et al. ...... believed to involve three distinct steps: (a) fast monomer activation; (b) rate-limiting nucleation; and (c) moderately fast elongation (for review see Pollard, 1990; Carlier, 1991; Estes et al., 1992).

www.pacermonitor.com/court/177/Tennessee_Western_District_Court

Johnson v. Navient Solutions LLC et al Court: Tennessee Western District Court Case Num: 1:18-cv-01011. Filed: Jan 11, 2018. Nature of suit: Other Statutes - Other Statutory Actions Cause: Civil Miscellaneous Case, 1:18-cv-01011, Jan 11, 2018. Hatfield et al v. Howmedica Osteonics d/b/a Stryker Orthopaedics et al Court: ...

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2172974

MmCP reduced the rate of depolymerization to 27% (Fig. 2 D). This is consistent with Cdc12(FH1FH2)p and MmCP capping the barbed (fast depolymerizing) ends of the filaments with high affinity (Kd < 0.1 μM), allowing dissociation only from the slowly depolymerizing (Pollard, 1986) pointed ends (Caldwell et al., 1989).

supreme-court-cases.insidegov.com/l/1111/Pollard-v-United-States

On February 25, 1957, the Supreme Court issued a 5-4 decision on Pollard v. United States that was conservative in nature.

www.americanbar.org/groups/committees/amicus/1940_1997.html

Fred J. Hoffmeister, et al. v. Edward M. Tod, Supreme Court, Missouri, No. 47,787 , approved by Board of Governors 8/2/60. State of Indiana v. Indiana Real Estate ... Billie Sol Estes v. The State of Texas, Supreme Court of the United States, No. 246, approved by Board of Governors 2/2/65. Graham and Graham Plow, Inc. v.

files.usgwarchives.net/mo/caldwell/legal/civil.txt

DeBOARD, James divorce File 7 POLLARD, Margaret Elizabeth vs. POLLARD, Peter divorce File 8 ROSS, Clayton vs. ... FILSON, W. T., et al note File 89 POLLARD, D.S. vs. STEPHENS, H. J. appeal File 90 HELMER, Joseph vs. ...... Jennie, et al File 2330 PETTY, Edward vs. COFFMAN, A. L. File 2331 ESTES, John H. vs.