Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bruesewitz_v._Wyeth

Wyeth. Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg. Supreme Court of the United States. Argued October 12, 2010. Decided February 22, 2011. Full case name, Russell Bruesewitz and Robalee Bruesewitz, Parents and Natural Guardians of Hannah Bruesewitz, A Minor Child, And In Their Own Right v. Wyeth Inc. F/K/A ...

www.oyez.org/cases/2010/09-152

Oct 12, 2010 ... When their daughter was three-years-old, Russell and Robalee Bruesewitz filed a petition seeking compensation for her injuries. One month prior to the petition, new regulations eliminated Hannah's seizure disorder from the list of compensable injuries. The family's petition was denied. Three years later, in ...

www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/09-152

Oct 12, 2010 ... After their daughter suffered severe health problems following a routine vaccination for diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (“DTP”), Russell and Robalee Bruesewitz sued Wyeth, Inc., the manufacturer of the vaccine, alleging that Wyeth's DTP vaccine was outmoded and inadequately designed. In response, Wyeth ...

www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/10pdf/09-152.pdf

Feb 22, 2011 ... RUSSELL BRUESEWITZ, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. WYETH LLC, FKA WYETH, INC., FKA WYETH. LABORATORIES, ET AL. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF. APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. [February 22, 2011]. JUSTICE SCALIA delivered the opinion of the Court.

www.americanbar.org/newsletter/publications/aba_health_esource_home/aba_health_law_esource_1104_brown.html

The Case: Bruesewitz v. Wyeth. The Bruesewitz case was filed by Russell and Robalee Bruesewitz, who claimed that their daughter, Hannah, experienced seizures and suffered permanent disabilities following the administration of a diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccine when she was six months old.7 Hannah's parents ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/09-152.html

In April 1995, Hannah's parents, Russell and Robalee Bruesewitz, filed a vaccine injury petition in the United States Court of Federal Claims, alleging that Hannah ..... Geier v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc., 529 U. S. 861, 883 (2000) (internal quotation marks omitted); see Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr, 518 U. S. 470, 506 (1996) ...

healthland.time.com/2011/02/24/bruesewitz-v-wyeth-what-the-supreme-court-decision-means-for-vaccines

Feb 24, 2011 ... Vaccine injury is a tricky thing to prove — medically and legally. So it was inevitably controversial when the Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday against the parents of Hannah Bruesewitz, 18, who suffered seizures and permanent brain damage after receiving a diptheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP) vaccine i...

www.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/11a0271p-06.pdf

Sep 22, 2011 ... 07-00018—Thomas B. Russell, Chief District Judge. Argued: ... Smith, et al. v. Wyeth, Inc., et al. Page 3. 1. Although Smith and Wilson claim to have consumed only generic metoclopramide, plaintiff. Morris does assert that he consumed some Reglan manufactured by Wyeth (but not Schwarz), a fact that.

www.wlf.org/litigating/case_detail.asp?id=630

Bruesewitz v. Wyeth, Inc. Case Date: 7/30/2010; Project Name: Health Care Project. On February 22, 2011, the U. S. Supreme Court held that a federal law expressly preempts all state-law products liability suits challenging the design of widely administered childhood vaccines, which the Food and Drug Administration ...