Web Results

media.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/16/01/143220P.pdf

Sep 21, 2015 ... decision in Petersen v. Astrue, 633 F.3d 633 (8th Cir. 2011) to avoid application of the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP). Plaintiffs are seeking to represent a class of dual status National Guard technicians who had their benefits determined prior to the issuance of the Petersen decision and would like to ...

www.justice.gov/opcl/definitions

Jul 16, 2015 ... EPA, 926 F.Supp.2d 48, 54-55 (D.D.C. 2013) (finding that third-party organization did not have standing to sue even though given written consent by subject individual allowing EPA to disclose records pertaining to him to organization); Raley v. Astrue, No. 2:11cv555, 2012 WL 2368609, at *8 (M.D. Ala.

repository.jmls.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1962&context=lawreview

Catherine Durkin Stewart, Legal Inconsistencies after Astrue v. .... This ruling, while an accurate and logical interpretation of the relevant statute,12 highlights the legal and ethical challenges. 1. Astrue v. Capato ex rel. B.N.C., 132 S. Ct. 2021, 2026 .... death of the individual they consented to the postmortem use of their.

www.opensecrets.org/revolving/search_result.php?admin=George+W.+Bush&id=9

Carter, Thomas L · Catanzaro, Michael J · Cave, Jennifer · Cervantes, Jennifer · Chadwick, Kirsten · Chang, Benjamin · Cheek, Marney L · Cheney, Dick · Christie, Ronald I · Clancy, Dean · Clarke, Victoria 'Tori' · Cole, Ray · Colucci, Marlene M · Conda, Cesar V · Conklin, Brian · Cooney, Philip · Cooper, Rory · Corbett, Bryan