Web Results

www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/06-1322.ZS.html

... is issued.The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321 . SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. v. HOLOWECKI et al.

www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/06-1322.ZO.html

Feb 27, 2008 ... ... of the United States, Washington, D. C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order that corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to press. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION, PETITIONER v. PAUL HOLOWECKI et al.

www.jenner.com/system/assets/assets/7408/original/Boaz_20v._20FedEx.pdf

Aug 6, 2013 ... Boaz v. FedEx, et al. Page 4 held that employees may not, either prospectively or retrospectively, waive their FLSA rights to minimum wages, overtime, or liquidated damages. D.A. Schulte, Inc. v. Gangi,. 328 U.S. 108, 114 (1946); O'Neil , 324 U.S. at 707; see also Runyan v. Nat'l Cash. Register Corp., 787 ...

www.oyez.org/cases/2007/06-1322

Nov 6, 2007 ... Federal Express Corporation v. Holowecki ... Respondent. Paul Holowecki et al. ... Paul Holowecki and other employees of Federal Express sued the corporation for age discrimination under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). A district court judge dismissed the complaint on the ground that ...

www.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/13a0209p-06.pdf

Aug 6, 2013 ... Boaz v. FedEx, et al. Page 4 held that employees may not, either prospectively or retrospectively, waive their FLSA rights to minimum wages, overtime, or liquidated damages. D.A. Schulte, Inc. v. Gangi,. 328 U.S. 108, 114 (1946); O'Neil , 324 U.S. at 707; see also Runyan v. Nat'l Cash. Register Corp., 787 ...

www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/federal-express-v-holowecki

Merits Briefs. Brief for Petitioner Federal Express Corporation · Brief for Respondent Paul Holowecki, et al. Reply Brief for Petitioner Federal Express Corporation. Amicus briefs. Brief for the United States in Support of Respondent · Brief for the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America in Support of Petitioner ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/tn-court-of-appeals/1126597.html

Court of Appeals of Tennessee. Steve MAIROSE, et al., v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION. No. W2000-00076-COA-R3-CV. Decided: July 24, 2001. ALAN E. HIGHERS, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which DAVID R. FARMER, J ., and HOLLY KIRBY LILLARD, J., joined.Kenneth Roberts,Larry Kelly, Denver, ...

www.leagle.com/decision/infdco20150818a73

Aug 17, 2015 ... Cristie R. REYNOLDS, et al, Plaintiffs, v. ... Each of them was terminated, and they filed this lawsuit alleging federal and state claims for gender discrimination. ..... Jackson v. FedEx Corp. , 518 F.3d 388 , 396 (6th Cir. 2008). Chipotle must then articulate a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for taking the ...

www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1393301/in-re-fedex-ground-package-system-inc

Jul 27, 2009 ... FedEx opposed class certification because (among other reasons adequately discussed with respect to other states) individualized evidence would be ... Hunt Bldg. Corp. v. Indus. Comm'n, 148 Ariz. 102, 713 P.2d 303, 307 (1986). To evaluate that right to control, Arizona courts look to the totality of the ...