Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens_United_v._FEC

Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), is a landmark U.S. constitutional law, campaign finance, and corporate law case dealing with regulation of political campaign spending by organizations. The United States Supreme Court held (5–4) on January 21, 2010 that the free speech clause of the ...

www.clearinghouse.net/detail.php?id=10607

On June 6, 2003, a group of African American and Latino employees filed a lawsuit Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and the California Fair Employment and Housing Act, Cal. Gov't Code § 12940 et seq. , ("FEHA"), against FedEx in Alamenda County Superior Court ... read more >.

www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/11pdf/10-6549.pdf

Jan 23, 2012 ... The federal Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (Act) re- ... REYNOLDS v. UNITED STATES. Syllabus concluding that the Act's registration requirements applied to pre-Act offenders even in the absence of a rule by the ... ment's broad general class (all sex offenders) and thus should control.

www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/06-1322.ZO.html

Feb 27, 2008 ... FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. v. ... Petitioner, Federal Express Corporation ( FedEx), provides mail pickup and delivery services to customers worldwide. .... casefile); Memorandum from Nicholas M. Inzeo, Director, Office of Field Programs , EEOC, to All District, Field, Area, and Local Office Directors et al. (Aug ...

www.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/13a0209p-06.pdf

Aug 6, 2013 ... Boaz v. FedEx, et al. Page 4 held that employees may not, either prospectively or retrospectively, waive their FLSA rights to minimum wages, overtime, or liquidated damages. D.A. Schulte, Inc. v. Gangi,. 328 U.S. 108, 114 (1946); O'Neil , 324 U.S. at 707; see also Runyan v. Nat'l Cash. Register Corp., 787 ...

www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/98/145

511; Benner et al. v. Porter, 9 How. 235; Clinton v. Englebrecht, 13 Wall. 434. They are courts of the Territories, invested for some purposes with the powers of the courts of the United States. Writs of error and appeals lie from them to the Supreme Court of the Territory, and from that court as a territorial court to this in some ...

www.kscourts.org/cases-and-opinions/opinions/SupCt/2013/20130607/107133.pdf

Jun 7, 2013 ... Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION,. Defendant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT. 1. The Uniform Certification of Questions of Law Act, K.S.A. 60- 3201 et seq., authorizes the Kansas Supreme Court to answer questions from courts of other jurisdictions when a response may be determinative of a ...

tobaccopolicycenter.org/tobacco-control/recent-cases

U.S.. FDA Graphic Warnings: RJ. Reynolds v. United States Food and Drug Administration;. American Academy of Pediatrics, et al. v. United States Food and Drug Administration ... Federal Ground Package System Inc. and Federal Express Corp. and City of New York and the People of the State of New York v. United ...

scholarship.law.wm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2168&context=facpubs

In 1879, the U.S. Supreme Court construed the Free Exercise Clause for the first time, holding in Reynolds v. United States that Congress could punish Mormon polygamy. Historians have interpreted Reynolds, and the anti-polygamy legislation and litigation that it midwifed, as an extension of Reconstruction into the ...