Web Results

www.justice.gov/atr/case/us-v-smith-international-inc-and-schlumberger-ltd

Aug 3, 2015 ... Declaration of Angela L. Hughes in Support of United States' Petition for an Order to Show Cause Why Respondents Smith International, Inc. and Schlumberger Ltd . Should Not Be Found in Civil Contempt (July 27, 1999). Memorandum of the United States in Support of Petition By the United States For An ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/in-court-of-appeals/1189318.html

Mar 14, 2001 ... In so holding, the court relied on International Union, U.A.A. & A.I. Workers of America (UAW), AFL-CIO v. Hoosier Cardinal Corp., 346 F.2d 242 (7th Cir.1965), aff'd., 383 U.S. 696, 86 S.Ct. 1107, 16 L.Ed.2d 192. In that case, the U.A.W. sought to recover vacation pay for the company's employees. Rejecting ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/tx-court-of-appeals/1505580.html

Nov 19, 2009 ... Case opinion for TX Court of Appeals MENSA WILMOT v. SMITH INTERNATIONAL INC. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.

pdfs.semanticscholar.org/0628/949a921386228b92876ac29182eb55fdf2f6.pdf

Stone v. Ritter and the Expanding Duty of Loyalty. Claire Hill. University of Minnesota Law School, hillx445@umn.edu. Brett McDonnell. University of Minnesota Law School, bhm@umn.edu. Follow this and ... In re Caremark International Inc. Derivative Litigation,2 until then a paradigmatic .... company. Following the Smith v.

www.patents4life.com/2017/10/re-smith-international-inc-whats-body

Oct 17, 2017 ... In re Smith, International, Inc., Appeal no. 2016-2303 (Fed. Cir., Sept. 16, 2017)(” Smith”), the Fed. Cir. reversed the PTAB (that had affirmed the Examiner's rejection of the claims) on the basis that the Board had subjected an element in Smith's claims to an oil drilling tool to the broadest “possible” ...

thelawschoolguys.com/law-students/case-briefs-bank/business-law-business-organizations/stone-v-ritter

The Trial Court looked to In re Caremark International Inc. Derivative Litigation ( 698 A.2d 959 (Del. Ch. 1996)), and found that when shareholders claim that the directors were ignorant to liabilities, the shareholder can only win if they show that there was a “sustained or systemic failure of the board to establish oversight.” .

ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4339&context=flr

Stone v. Ritter and the Expanding Duty of Loyalty. Claire A. Hill. Brett H. McDonnell. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for ... In re Caremark International Inc. Derivative Litigation,2 until then a .... Following the Smith v.

www.casebriefs.com/blog/law/business-associations/business-associations-keyed-to-hamilton/duty-of-care-and-the-business-judgment-rule-business-associations-keyed-to-hamilton-business-associations-law/stone-v-ritter

Citation. Stone v. Ritter, 911 A.2d 362, 2006 Del. LEXIS 597 (Del. Nov. 6, 2006) Brief Fact Summary. Shareholders (Plaintiff) brought a derivative. ... The shareholders (Plaintiff) of AmSouth brought a derivative action against the corporation's directors (Defendant) based on these events, claiming they breached their ...

www.quimbee.com/cases/stone-v-ritter

You'll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois— even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student ...