Apr 12, 2018 ... Fisher et al v. TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. et al (2:18-cv-03073), California Central District Court, Filed: 04/12/2018 - PacerMonitor Mobile Federal and Bankruptcy Court PACER Dockets.
Nancy COOPER, Individually and as Successor, etc., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS AMERICA, INC., et al., Defendants and Respondents.
Dec 20, 2012 ... But under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., a contradiction of the employer's proffered reason for the termination of an ... viewing all the evidence, and drawing all reasonable factual inferences, in favor of Ms. Kragor. See Rioux v. City of Atlanta, 520 F.3d 1269, 1274 (11th ...
Jan 17, 2012 ... Defendant: Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd, Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals L L C, Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Inc, Takeda Global Research & Development Center Inc, Takeda San Diego Inc, Takeda California Inc and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc.
Mar 7, 2018 ... Blue Cross is represented by David J. McMorris and Marilyn T. McGoldrick of Thornton & Naumes LLP. The case is Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Massachusetts Inc. et al. v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc. et al., case number 1:17-cv-11660, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts.