Web Results

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/09-152.html

United States Supreme Court. BRUESEWITZ ET AL. v. WYETH LLC, FKA WYETH, INC., ET AL., (2011). No. 09-152. Argued: October 12, 2010 Decided: February 22, 2011. The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 (NCVIA or Act) created a no-fault compensation program to stabilize a vaccine market adversely ...

healthland.time.com/2011/02/24/bruesewitz-v-wyeth-what-the-supreme-court-decision-means-for-vaccines

Feb 24, 2011 ... Vaccine injury is a tricky thing to prove — medically and legally. So it was inevitably controversial when the Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday against the parents of Hannah Bruesewitz, 18, who suffered seizures and permanent brain damage after receiving a diptheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP) vaccine i...

www.oyez.org/cases/2010/09-152

Oct 12, 2010 ... Bruesewitz v. Wyeth Inc. ... Respondent. Wyeth, Inc., fka Wyeth Laboratories, et al . ... defective design. A federal judge dismissed the lawsuit, ruling that the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act protected Wyeth from lawsuits over vaccine injury claims. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit affirmed.

www.law360.com/articles/922348/pfizer-settles-fee-dispute-in-785m-fca-deal

May 10, 2017 ... Sakla Law Firm APLC is represented by Lisa Arrowood, Kevin T. Peters and Jennifer A. Henricks of Arrowood Peters LLP and Richard C. Stanley and William M. Ross of Stanley Reuter Ross Thornton & Alford LLC. The case is U.S. ex rel. LaCorte et al. v. Wyeth Inc., case numbers 1:03-cv-12366 and ...

www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/wyeth-v-levine

... Brief for Vermont, Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New ...

schachtmanlaw.com/biographical

I was designated as trial counsel for what was to be Pfizer's first case set for trial, in Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas, in 2007 — Coleman v. Wyeth et al. After I argued the motion for summary judgment based upon the statute of limitations, the trial court entered judgment on the eve of trial. Coleman v. Wyeth Pharms.

www.schneiderwallace.com/other_cases_types.php?type=Stockholder%20Suits

Below is a list of cases filed accross the country by other law firms that fall within our practice area of: Stockholder Suits. aba z&b Schleifmaschinen GmbH v. aba z&b USA In View Case »; aba z&b Schleifmaschinen GmbH v. aba z&b USA In View Case »; Adams Family Trust et al v. Syron et al View Case »; AF Portfolio ( BVI) ...

www.reminger.com/media/publication/321_FinalProductsLiabilitySummer2015.pdf

for the products liability practitioner to know the answer to that question. As this article explains, the answer is somewhat complicated because of the “National. Childhood Vaccine Injury Act,” (the “NCVIA”) and the United States Supreme Court's response to the NCVIA in Bruesewitz, et al. v. Wyeth LLC, et al.4 Thanks to the ...

www.druganddevicelawblog.com/2014/07/innovator-liability-at-100.html

Jul 18, 2014 ... Bloodsworth v. Smith & Nephew, 2005 WL 3470337, at *5 (M.D. Ala. Dec. 19, 2005). None of that mattered to (or was even cited by) the Alabama ..... Kansas has as product liability statute, K.S.A. §60-3301, et seq., which merges all common-law theories and requires that the defendant be in the chain of ...