Web Results

cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2009/06/19/07-16356.pdf

Jun 19, 2009 ... judgment in favor of Simon & Schuster, Inc. and ipsh!net Inc. (“ipsh!”).1 Satterfield alleges a violation of the Telephone. Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), 47 U.S.C. § 227, arising after Satterfield received an unsolicited text message. We hold that there is a genuine issue of material fact concerning whether ...

blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2009/07/ninth_circuit_r.htm

Jul 3, 2009 ... By Eric Goldman. Satterfield v. Simon & Schuster, Inc., No. 07-16356 (9th Circuit June 19, 2009). Satterfield sued Simon & Schuster (and its mobile ad agency) for sending text messages to her cellphone without the requisite permission. The district court dismissed her lawsuit; but in this ruling, the Ninth ...

casetext.com/case/satterfield-v-simon-schuster-inc

Quoted 1 times. Laci SATTERFIELD, individually, and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SIMON SCHUSTER, INC., a New York corporation;Ipsh!Net, a Delaware corporation akaIpsh, Defendants-Appellees. No . 07-16356. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted February ...

classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2009/07/class_action_defense_casessatt.html

Jul 13, 2009 ... Plaintiff filed a putative class action against Simon & Schuster, Inc. and ipsh!net Inc. alleging violations of the federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) , 47 U.S.C. § 227; the class action complaint was filed after plaintiff received an unsolicited text message. Satterfield v. Simon & Schuster, Inc., 569 ...

www.mobilemarketer.com/ex/mobilemarketer/cms/news/legal-privacy/21874.html

Satterfield v. Simon & Schuster Inc., 2014. U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Case Number 07-16356. Gragg v. Orange Cab Co., 2014. Washington Western District Court. Case number 2:2012cv00576. Marks v. Crunch San Diego LLC, 2014. California Southern District Court. Case Number 3:2014cv00348. Luna v.

newmedialaw.proskauer.com/2009/06/22/ninth-circuit-executes-dictionary-attack-on-telephone-consumer-protection-act

Jun 22, 2009 ... The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued its opinion today in Satterfield v. Simon & Schuster, Inc., a case involving the applicability of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act to text messages sent to cellular phones. The appeals court reinstated a TCPA claim against Simon & Schuster and remanded the ...

www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=6536f995-12c8-4e57-966a-54a6705846f2

Feb 23, 2016 ... The court also distinguished Satterfield v. Simon & Schuster, Inc., where a panel of the Ninth Circuit concluded that a person's consent to receive calls from one business does not constitute consent to receive calls from a different business. Although a similar situation existed in the Sabre case—Baird ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-9th-circuit/1762709.html

Dec 22, 2016 ... See 47 U.S.C. § 227(b)(1)(A)(iii) (prohibiting use of an automatic telephone dialing system or an artificial or prerecorded voice to make a call to a cellular phone without prior express consent); see also Satterfield v. Simon & Schuster, Inc., 569 F.3d 946, 953 (9th Cir. 2009) (noting that Congress delegated ...

www.squirepattonboggs.com/~/media/files/insights/publications/2014/07/a-tcpa-for-the-21st-century/atcpaforthe21stcentury.pdf

settled for $10 million (Satterfield v. Simon & Schuster,. Inc., Settlement Agreement and Final Judgment and. Order of Dismissal, 2010). After Satterfield, it was clear that it would no longer be a sufficient defense in TCPA litigation to argue that a system did not actually store, produce or call randomly or sequentially generated ...