Web Results

www.classaction.org/media/satterfield-v-simon-schuster-appeals-opinion.pdf

Jun 19, 2009 ... judgment in favor of Simon & Schuster, Inc. and ipsh!net Inc. (“ipsh!”).1 Satterfield alleges a violation of the Telephone. Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), 47 U.S.C. § 227, arising after Satterfield received an unsolicited text message. We hold that there is a genuine issue of material fact concerning whether ...

cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2009/06/19/07-16356.pdf

Jun 19, 2009 ... judgment in favor of Simon & Schuster, Inc. and ipsh!net Inc. (“ipsh!”).1 Satterfield alleges a violation of the Telephone. Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), 47 U.S.C. § 227, arising after Satterfield received an unsolicited text message. We hold that there is a genuine issue of material fact concerning whether ...

classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2009/07/class_action_defense_casessatt.html

Jul 13, 2009 ... Plaintiff filed a putative class action against Simon & Schuster, Inc. and ipsh!net Inc. alleging violations of the federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) , 47 U.S.C. § 227; the class action complaint was filed after plaintiff received an unsolicited text message. Satterfield v. Simon & Schuster, Inc., 569 ...

casetext.com/case/satterfield-v-simon-schuster-inc

Laci Satterfield, individually and on behalf of those similarly situated, appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Simon Schuster, Inc. and ipsh!net Inc. ("ipsh!"). Satterfield alleges a violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act ("TCPA"), 47 U.S.C. § 227, arising after Satterfield received an ...

blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2009/07/ninth_circuit_r.htm

Jul 3, 2009 ... By Eric Goldman. Satterfield v. Simon & Schuster, Inc., No. 07-16356 (9th Circuit June 19, 2009). Satterfield sued Simon & Schuster (and its mobile ad agency) for sending text messages to her cellphone without the requisite permission. The district court dismissed her lawsuit; but in this ruling, the Ninth ...

www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=6536f995-12c8-4e57-966a-54a6705846f2

Feb 23, 2016 ... The court also distinguished Satterfield v. Simon & Schuster, Inc., where a panel of the Ninth Circuit concluded that a person's consent to receive calls from one business does not constitute consent to receive calls from a different business. Although a similar situation existed in the Sabre case—Baird ...

newmedialaw.proskauer.com/2009/06/22/ninth-circuit-executes-dictionary-attack-on-telephone-consumer-protection-act

Jun 22, 2009 ... The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued its opinion today in Satterfield v. Simon & Schuster, Inc., a case involving the applicability of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act to text messages sent to cellular phones. The appeals court reinstated a TCPA claim against Simon & Schuster and remanded the ...

www.squirepattonboggs.com/~/media/files/insights/publications/2014/07/a-tcpa-for-the-21st-century/atcpaforthe21stcentury.pdf

settled for $10 million (Satterfield v. Simon & Schuster,. Inc., Settlement Agreement and Final Judgment and. Order of Dismissal, 2010). After Satterfield, it was clear that it would no longer be a sufficient defense in TCPA litigation to argue that a system did not actually store, produce or call randomly or sequentially generated ...

buckleysandler.com/sites/default/files/Buckley%20Sandler%20InfoBytes%20-%20Fober%20v.%20Management%20and%20Technology%20Consultants%2C%20LLC%20-%209th%20Circuit%20Opinion%202018.03.29.pdf

Mar 29, 2018 ... We therefore need not and do not opine on the effect of the Intake Form. A. Statutory and Regulatory Framework. Congress enacted the TCPA to protect the interests of telephone users by placing restrictions on “unsolicited, automated telephone calls.” Satterfield v. Simon & Schuster,. Inc., 569 F.3d 946, 954 ...