Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon_%26_Schuster,_Inc._v._Crime_Victims_Board

Simon & Schuster v. Crime Victims Board, 502 U.S. 105 (1991), was a Supreme Court case dealing with Son of Sam laws, which are state laws that prevent ...

cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2009/06/19/07-16356.pdf

Jun 19, 2009 ... D.C. No. v. CV-06-02893-CW. SIMON & SCHUSTER, INC., a New. OPINION ... Laci Satterfield, individually and on behalf of those simi-.

blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2009/07/ninth_circuit_r.htm

Jul 3, 2009 ... Simon & Schuster, Inc., No. 07-16356 (9th Circuit June 19, 2009). Satterfield sued Simon & Schuster (and its mobile ad agency) for sending text ... The FCC took this position in 2003, and in 2005, I blogged on the Joffe v.

casetext.com/case/satterfield-v-simon-schuster-inc

www.mccarter.com/TCPA-The-Next-Wave-of-Class-Action-Lawsuits-Asserts-Consumers-Right-to-Withdraw-Consent-to-Receive-Text-Messages-02-14-2017

Feb 14, 2017 ... In Satterfield v. Simon & Schuster, Inc., 569 F.3d 946, 952 (9th Cir. 2009), the court expanded the TCPA's reach to cover text messages, holding ...

www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=6536f995-12c8-4e57-966a-54a6705846f2

Feb 23, 2016 ... The court also distinguished Satterfield v. Simon & Schuster, Inc., where a panel of the Ninth Circuit concluded that a person's consent to ...

www.wileyrein.com/newsroom-newsletters-item-4663.html

See 18 FCC Rcd. 14014, 14115 ¶265 (2003); Satterfield v. Simon & Schuster, Inc ., 569 F.3d 946 (9th Cir. 2009). Whether a message is “telemarketing” depends ...

www.squirepattonboggs.com/~/media/files/insights/publications/2014/07/a-tcpa-for-the-21st-century/atcpaforthe21stcentury.pdf

calls (Nelson v. Santandar Consumer USA Inc, 2013, p. 8). The Nelson court relied on a Ninth Circuit Court of. Appeals opinion, Satterfield v. Simon & Schuster ...

www.pillsburylaw.com/en/news-and-insights/stop-calling-me-can-consumers-waive-the-right-to-revoke-consent-1.html

Jan 14, 2015 ... ... making autodialed or pre-recorded telemarketing calls.1 The Ninth Circuit, in Satterfield v. Simon & Schuster, Inc., 569 F.3d 946, 952 (9th Cir.