Caterpillar Inc. is an American Fortune 100 corporation which designs, develops, engineers, ..... The behavior of all employees is governed by a Code of Worldwide Business Conduct, first published in .... In 1999, the former Caterpillar executive Daniel Schlicksup accused the company of funneling profits from ..... " The UN vs.


Sep 9, 2011 ... BGC Schlicksup v. Caterpillar, Inc. et al, No. 1:2009cv01208 - Document 116 ( C.D. Ill. 2011) case opinion from the Central District of Illinois U.S. ...


Filing 42. ORDER entered by Judge Michael M. Mihm on 7/13/10. Plaintiff is able to present sufficient evidence to create a material issue under 18 U.S.C. ...


Mar 28, 2017 ... Before the Court are Defendant Caterpillar, Inc.'s ("Caterpillar") motions for summary judgment, ECF Nos. ... Schlicksup v. ... when the position was going to be filled, and Sun said that Shankar and others were working on it.


Mar 3, 2017 ... three Caterpillar Inc. facilities, including the global headquarters ... In his complaint against Caterpillar, Schlicksup alleged the company sold ...


Oct 4, 2018 ... All this makes Société G é nérale Securities Services, GbmH v. Caterpillar, Inc irresistible. ... is when the relationship between Caterpillar and Mr. Schlicksup became strained, which led to litigation - Schlicksup v Caterpillar.


Sep 26, 2018 ... The case is Société Générale Securities Services GMBH v. Caterpillar Inc et al, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois, No. 17-01713.


Jun 1, 2017 ... In the the spring of 2008, finance executives from Caterpillar Inc. gathered ... “I am now an example to my colleagues, peers, and others that they made ... Schlicksup might end up the best-paid whistleblower of all time, with a ...


Oct 11, 2017 ... Caterpillar Inc. asked an Illinois federal court Tuesday to dismiss securities fraud class ... lawsuit related to Caterpillar's alleged abuse of European tax shelters, Mogell v. ... The man who brought the 2009 lawsuit, Daniel Schlicksup, settled it in 2012. ... Societe Generale Securities Services GmbH et al v.