Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wyeth_v._Levine

Wyeth v. Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009), is a United States Supreme Court case holding that Federal regulatory clearance of a medication does not shield the manufacturer from liability under state law. Contents. [hide]. 1 Facts. 1.1 Vermont jury trial; 1.2 Phenergan's regulatory background; 1.3 Wyeth's motion for judgment as a ...

www.4lawschool.com/torts/torts.htm

Torts Case Briefs by Bram. Nova Southeastern. Professor Epstein 535 Madison Ave. Gourmet Foods, Inc. v. Finlandia Ctr. Inc. Alcorn v. Anbro Engineering, Inc. Anderson v. Minneapolis Anderson v. Owens- ...

www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/06-1249.ZS.html

Syllabus. NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.See United States v.

www.druganddevicelawblog.com/2014/11/who-heeds-heeding-presumption.html

Nov 7, 2014 ... Wyeth, 500 F. Supp.2d 1063, 1069 (S.D. Ill. 2007) (same). Indiana. An intermediate Indiana appellate court was an early adopter of the heeding presumption. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp. v. Chapman, 388 N.E.2d 541, 555 (Ind. App. 1979) (“[w]here warnings are inadequate, however, the presumption [in ...

care.diabetesjournals.org/content/25/10/1749.short

Ann V. Schwartz, PHD1,; Teresa A. Hillier, MD2,; Deborah E. Sellmeyer, MD3,; Helaine E. Resnick, PHD4,; Edward Gregg, PHD5,; Kristine E. Ensrud, MD67,; Pamela J. Schreiner, PHD6,; Karen L. Margolis, MD8,; Jane A. Cauley, DRPH9,; Michael C. Nevitt, PHD1,; Dennis M. Black, PHD1,; Steven R. Cummings, MD3 and ...

www.labaton.com/en/cases/upload/L-Sucharow-Declaration-Exhibits-16-32-2.pdf

Jun 23, 2016 ... Federal Agencies with Federalism in Wyeth v. Levine,” 84 Tulane L. Rev. 1275 ( 2010); “Just. Choose: The Jurisprudential Necessity to Select a Single Governing Law for Mass Claims Arising from Nationally Marketed Consumer Goods and Services,” Roger Williams University Law. Review (Winter 2009); ...

www.umsl.edu/~irelandt/DecisionsDeveloped2012.html

May 3, 2012. Baldonado v. Wyeth, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59512 (N.D. IL 2012). The Court granted in part a motion to exclude the punitive damages testimony of the ... Schreiner v. Fruit, 519 P.2d 462 (Alaska 1974). This decision held that a wife has an independent right to sue of loss of consortium due to negligently inflicted ...

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK279050

Feb 25, 2015 ... Menopause, defined as twelve months after a woman's final menstrual period, is a natural event that marks the end of spontaneous ovulation and thus reproductive capabilities. In the Western world, the average age of menopause is 51 years.

www.kccllc.com/class-action/clients/representative-case-list

A. Adalat Antitrust Settlement. Adderall XR® Settlement · Animation Workers Antitrust Litigation. Auto Refinishing Paint Cases. C. California Electrical Carbon Products Cases. California Laminate Antitrust Litigation. California Polychloroprene Cases. Competition Collision Center v. Crompton Corp. Corn Syrup Cases.