Relying on the Supreme Court's previous decision in Martin v. Waddell, 41 U.S. 367 (1842), Justice Shiras argued that none of the Maryland landholders could claim title to the riverbed, either. The majority held the original landholders were to hold the river and its bed in trust for the public, and that after the American ...
Sacher v. United States, 343 U.S. 1 (1952), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld the convictions of five attorneys for contempt of court. Contents. [hide]. 1 Background; 2 Opinion of the Court; 3 See also; 4 Footnotes; 5 References; 6 External links. Background. Main article: Smith Act trials ...
Michael Scott Martin, Plaintiff-appellant, v. O.l. Mccotter, Director, Texas Department of Corrections,defendant-appellee, 796 F.2d 813 (5th Cir. 1986) case opinion from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Only last Term, this Court relied upon these precedents in United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co., 430 U.S. 564 (1977), and held that the Government could not appeal the granting of a motion to acquit pursuant to Fed. Rule Crim. Proc. 29 where a second trial would be required upon remand. The Court, quoting language ...
In the United States Court of Federal Claims. No. 13-834C. (E-Filed February 13, 2017). DONALD MARTIN, JR., et al,. Plaintiffs, v. THE UNITED STATES,. Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Cross-Motions for Summary. Judgment; RCFC 56(a); Fair Labor. Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219. (2012); Award of Liquidated Damages.
A summary and case brief of Martin v. United States, including the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, key terms, and concurrences and dissents.
Oct 19, 2011 ... Scott D. MARTIN, Individually and as Trustee of the Ruben S. Martin, III, Dynasty Trust, Appellant, v. ...... the evidence is legally insufficient to support the mental anguish damages for both Courtney and Robin, it is not necessary for us to address Scott's other challenges to the sufficiency of the evidence.
419 F.2d 264. Vincent E. SCOTT, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. No. 20954. United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit. Argued September 9, 1968. Decided February 13, 1969. Mr. James L. McHugh, Jr., Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. John L. Ingoldsby, Jr., Washington, D. C., ( both ...