Web Results

jenner.com/system/assets/assets/2573/original/SEC_v_Jenkins.pdf?1319135987

Jun 9, 2010 ... Four motions are pending before the Court:(1) Defendant Maynard L. Jenkins's. (“ Jenkins” or “Defendant”) Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. # 17), (2) Plaintiff Securities and. Exchange Commission's (“SEC” or “Plaintiff”) Motion for Ruling Regarding Request for. Judicial Notice (Dkt. # 24), (3) the SEC's Motion for ...

www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/2009/lr21149a.htm

Jul 30, 2009 ... U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. Litigation Release No. 21149A / July 23, 2009. Accounting and Auditing Release No. 3025 / July 23, 2009. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Maynard L. Jenkins, Case No. CV 09-1510-PHX-JWS (D. Ariz.) SEC SEEKS RETURN OF $4 MILLION IN ...

www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/2016/lr23638.htm

Sep 7, 2016 ... Litigation Release No. 23638 / September 7, 2016. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Gordon W. Jenkins, Theodore P. Sweeten, Francis W. Kreais and Craig L. Parkinson, Civil Action No. 4:16-cv-00402-CWD (D. Idaho filed Sept. 7, 2016). SEC Charges Four in Offering Fraud Related to Purported ...

www.law360.com/articles/177827/implications-of-sec-v-jenkins

Jul 12, 2010 ... In U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jenkins, the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona has provided the first judicial gloss on the “clawback” provision of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, says Jared L. Kopel of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati PC.

corpgov.law.harvard.edu/tag/sec-v-jenkins

www.fenwick.com/publications/pages/securities-litigation-update-sec-v-jenkins-sox-304-clawback-requires-innocent-ceos-and-cfos-to-return-incentive.aspx

Jun 16, 2010 ... In SEC v. Jenkins, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") filed a complaint against Maynard Jenkins, the former CEO of CSK Auto Corp. ("CSK"), and invoked Section 304 to "claw back" more than $4 million in bonuses, incentive compensation and stock profits that he earned while CSK was ...

cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2016/08/31/14-55221.pdf

Aug 31, 2016 ... Tull v. United. States, 481 U.S. 412, 422 (1987). Although much of the relief sought by the SEC was equitable, for which there is not a right to a jury, the ...... and to have unfairly benefitted therefrom.” SEC v. Jenkins,. 718 F.Supp.2d 1070, 1075 (D. Ariz. 2010); see also SEC v. Baker, No. A-12-CA-285-SS, ...

www.law.georgetown.edu/academics/law-journals/gjlpp/upload/zs800112000321.PDF

reaching the Act will be until the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) completes its mandatory rulemaking. ..... See SEC v. Jenkins, 718 F. Supp. 2d 1070 (D. Ariz. 2010). 27. Robbie Wheelan & Joann S. Lublin, Beazer CEO Will Give Back Incentive Pay in Settlement,. WALL ST. J. (Mar. 4, 2011), available at ...

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/436/103

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Sloan. No. 76-1607. Argued March 27- 28, 1978. Decided May 15, 1978. 436 U.S. 103. Syllabus. The Securities and Exchange Commission (Commission) has the authority under § 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Act) "summarily to suspend trading in any security . . . for ...