Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bivens_v._Six_Unknown_Named_Agents

Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), was a case in which the US Supreme Court ruled that an implied cause of action existed for an ...

www.oyez.org/cases/1970/301

Jan 12, 1971 ... In 1965, six agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics forced their way into Webster Bivens' home without a warrant and searched the premises ...

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/403/388

While there is no explicit right to file a civil lawsuit against federal government officials who have violated the Fourth Amendment, this right can be inferred.

www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/403/388

403 U.S. 388 (91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619). Webster BIVENS, Petitioner, v. SIX UNKNOWN NAMED AGENTS OF FEDERAL BUREAU OF NARCOTICS. No.

www.casebriefs.com/blog/law/torts/torts-keyed-to-prosser/torts-in-the-age-of-statutes/bivens-v-six-unknown-named-agents-of-federal-bureau-of-narcotics-2

Citation. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S. Ct. 1999, 29 L. Ed. 2d 619, 1971 U.S. LEXIS 23 (U.S. June 21, ...

www.quimbee.com/cases/bivens-v-six-unknown-named-agents-of-federal-bureau-of-narcotics

A summary and case brief of Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, including the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning,  ...

scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1188&context=facultyworkingpapers

Six Unknown-Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics. James E. Pfander. Northwestern University School of Law, j-pfander@law.northwestern. edu.

study.com/academy/lesson/bivens-v-six-unknown-named-agents-of-the-federal-bureau-of-narcotics-case-brief.html

Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, the Supreme Court was called upon to decide whether federal agents could be sued for an ...

openjurist.org/456/f2d/1339/bivens-v-six-unknown-named-agents-of-federal-bureau-of-narcotics

SIX UNKNOWN NAMED AGENTS OF the FEDERAL BUREAU OF NARCOTICS, Defendants-Appellees. No. 422, Docket 32537. United States Court of Appeals,