Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smith_v._Board_of_School_Commissioners_of_Mobile_County

Smith v. Board of School Commissioners of Mobile County, 827 F.2d 684 (11th Cir. 1987), was a lawsuit in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held that the Mobile County Public School System could use textbooks which purportedly promoted "secular humanism", characterized by the  ...

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Employment_Division_v._Smith

Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990), is a United States Supreme Court case that held that the state could deny unemployment benefits to a person fired for violating a state prohibition on the use of peyote, even though the use of the drug was part of a religious ...

www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/23526975/Smith_v_Long_et_al

Jan 18, 2018 ... Smith v. Long et al (3:18-cv-00061), Tennessee Middle District Court, Filed: 01/18 /2018 - PacerMonitor Mobile Federal and Bankruptcy Court PACER Dockets.

scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/4110/index.do

Bell et al. v. Smith et al., [1968] S.C.R. 664. Date: 1968-05-22. Helen Bell, James E. Bell and David Grey Bell and Marjorie Bell, Infants Under the Age of Twenty- one .... The plaintiff Helen Bell has testified that, after a very long conference on January 12, 1966, she and her co-plaintiffs agreed to the settlement which was ...

www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/331/469

331 U.S. 469 (67 S.Ct. 1330, 91 L.Ed. 1610). UNITED STATES v. SMITH et al. No . 498. Argued: March 11, 1947. Decided: June 2, 1947. opinion, JACKSON [ HTML]. Rehearing Denied Oct. 13, 1947. See 68 S.Ct. 28. Mr. Douglas W. McGregor, of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Mr. Robert T. McCracken, of Philadelphia, Pa., ...

www.fdsettlement.com

Important Update: On April 17, 2017, Settlement benefits were distributed to Settlement Class Members who submitted valid and approved claims. Pursuant to the term of the Settlement, Settlement Class Members who elected the Store Credit Option received their awards in the form of a Floor & Decor Gift Card and ...

www.eruvlitigation.com/prior-eruv-litigation/joseph-m-smith-et-al-plaintiffs-v-community-board-no-14-et-al-defendants

Recent Posts. A Tale Of Three Councils – The Failure of Robert Hermansen · [ UPDATE][Settlement] MONTVALE SETTLES ERUV DISPUTE (eruv stays) · Everyday Racism: 84 years ago and today · [UPDATE] Hermansen & Chewcaskie: How Chronic Liars Deceive You · Robert Hermansen: Fool them once, shame on you.

www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/17pdf/16-1067_q86b.pdf

19 hours ago ... SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. Syllabus. MURPHY v. SMITH ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR. THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 16–1067. .... contends, necessarily means that the district court must enjoy discretion to pick any “portion” so long as.

www.documentcloud.org/documents/4062120-Tenae-Smith-Et-Al-v-Westminster-Management-Et-Al.html

Tenae Smith Et Al v Westminster Management Et Al Complaint. Document. Pages. Notes. Text. Zoom. CLOSE. Previous for “” Next. p. 1. Loading Loading. p. 2. Loading Loading. p. 3. Loading Loading. « Page Note 1 of 27 0. » Tenae Smith Et Al v Westminster Management Et Al Complaint. Contents. Original Document ...