en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smith_v_Jones

Smith v Jones is a 1999 judgment of the Supreme Court of Canada, and was decided on appeal from the court of appeal for British Columbia. The Appellant ...

law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca10/14-6214/14-6214-2015-03-26.html

Smith v. Jones, No. 14-6214 (10th Cir. 2015) case opinion from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.

scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/1689/index.do

Smith v. Jones, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 455. James Jones Appellant. v. John Smith Respondent. and. Southam Inc. Intervener. Indexed as: Smith v. Jones. File No.

pdfs.semanticscholar.org/9ea4/120ce17601e6ad1b4224e835584dec266c8d.pdf

The recent decision of the Supreme Court of Canada titled Smith v. Jones has made major changes to the way forensic psy- chiatry may be practiced in Canada  ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-11th-circuit/1015049.html

Case opinion for US 11th Circuit SMITH v. JONES. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.

revolutionsincommunication.com/law/?page_id=249

The way a civil law case works can be described in this hypothetical case of Smith v Jones. For the purposes of this hypothetical case, Samantha Smith is a state ...

jaapl.org/content/27/4/614

Dec 1, 1999 ... Canadian landmark case, Smith v. Jones, supreme court of Canada: confidentiality and privilege suffer another blow. RJ O'Shaughnessy, GD ...

canliiconnects.org/en/summaries/34279

Dec 1, 2014 ... ·(gist: an action commenced by a psychiatrist who wished to break the rule of solicitor-client confidentiality based on a concern for public safety.

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10638788

J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1999;27(4):614-20. Canadian landmark case, Smith v . Jones, supreme court of Canada: confidentiality and privilege suffer another ...