Web Results

www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/24231840/TAYLOR_v_ABBOTT_LABORATORIES_et_al

6 days ago ... Tuesday, April 17, 2018. 2, 2 service Summons Issued Tue 4:31 PM SUMMONS ISSUED as to ABBOTT LABORATORIES, ASTRAZENECA LP, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, EISAI CO., LTD, GLAXOSMITHKLINE CONSUMER HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS (US) IP LLC, GLAXOSMITHKLINE ...

www.casebriefs.com/blog/law/patent-law/patent-law-keyed-to-adelman/novelty/apotex-usa-inc-v-merck-co-inc

Citation. Apotex USA, Inc. v. Merck & Co., 254 F.3d 1031, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 11864, 59 U.S.P.Q.2D (BNA) 1139, 2001 WL 630026 (Fed. Cir. June 8, 2001)

www.justice.gov/atr/case/us-v-merck-co-inc-2010

Oct 4, 2016 ... Order Terminating the Consent Decree (September 21, 2011). Memorandum of the United States in Response to the Motion of Merck & Co., Inc. to Terminate the Consent Decree (July 26, 2011). Stipulation Between Parties in Support of the Unopposed Motion of Merck & Co., Inc. to Terminate the Consent ...

www.cafc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/opinions-orders/16-1216.Opinion.10-24-2016.1.PDF

Oct 26, 2016 ... The inserts “position[] the ankle joint or sub taylor. [sic] joint in a relaxed position by correcting ... PROFOOT, INC. v. MERCK & CO., INC. 4. Claims 1 and 3 are asserted. They recite: 1. A method of fitting an individual with right and left foot inserts which place the ankles of the indi- vidual in a neutral position ...

law.justia.com/cases/kentucky/supreme-court/1981/618-s-w-2d-432-1.html

618 S.W.2d 432 (1981). Rodney E. TAYLOR, Movant, v. FITZ COAL COMPANY, INC., et al., Respondents. Supreme Court of Kentucky. April 14, 1981. John R. Triplett, McCoy, Marcum & Triplett, Inez, for movant. Paul P. Burchett, Prestonsburg, Phillip O. North, Charleston, James D. McQueen, Jr., Huntington, for respondents ...

www.druganddevicelawblog.com/2012/11/hail-hail-to-michigan.html

Nov 21, 2012 ... Accord Taylor v. Smithkline Beecham Corp., 658 N.W.2d 127, 131 (Mich. 2003) (“ [T]he Legislature has determined that a drug manufacturer or seller that ... Duronio v. Merck & Co.,, No. 267003, 2006 WL 1628516, at *3 (Mich. Ct. App. June 13, 2006). Those exceptions are (1) selling the drug after the FDA ...

www.druganddevicelawblog.com/2008/07/no-injury-scorecard.html

Jul 3, 2008 ... Taylor v. Medtronics, Inc., 861 F.2d 980 (6th Cir. Nov. 22, 1988). Risk of pacemaker lead failure is not sufficient injury where plaintiff's lead never failed. ... Upjohn Co. v. Freeman, 885 S.W.2d 538 (Tex. App. Aug. 26, 1994). Loss of consortium claim is derivative and fails where spouse was not injured by use ...

www.merck.com/corporate-responsibility/docs/business-ethics-transparency/3Q10-Transparency-Report.pdf

Merck & Co., Inc., Disclosure of Payments to U.S. Speakers for Promotional (non- CME) Medical Education Activities for programs conducted in 2010 (and programs ...... Davis, Mary V Total. Davis, Ray S Total. Dawson, Norma Total. De Bell, William Keith Total. De Cotiis, Bruce Anthony Total. De Haven, Joseph Wm Total.

www.stonelaw.com/Results.shtml

LaCorte v. Merck and Co., Inc. (2008). $250,000,000.00. Settlement USDC - ED Louisiana Qui Tam case in which whistle blower claims that Merck underreported the "best price" of its drug brand Pepcid® to the government in an illegal scheme resulting in overcharging Medicare, Medicaid and other governmental health ...