law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/cafc/11-1105/11-1105-2012-08-13.html

Wake Forest is the owner of asserted patents, and KCI are the exclusive licensees of the patents, which claim methods and apparatuses for treating ...

www.patentdocs.org/2018/02/arthrex-inc-v-smith-nephew-inc-fed-cir-2018.html

Feb 6, 2018 ... ... Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., affirming the PTAB's interpretation of the rule. ... the IPR because all the challenged claims had been disclaimed.

www.mdd.uscourts.gov/sites/mdd/files/Case%20Management%20Order%20No.%207.pdf

Lewis Williams Jr and Angela Williams v. ... Austin Davis Twigg IV and Joan Twigg v. ..... Smith & Nephew, Inc. et al. ..... Denise Thorpe and James Thorpe v.

www.cafc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/opinions-orders/17-1389.Opinion.3-12-2018.1.PDF

Mar 14, 2018 ... STOLL, Circuit Judge. Appellant Hologic, Inc. initiated an inter partes reex- amination of U.S. Patent No. 8,061,359, which is owned.

www2.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/163785p.pdf

Mar 1, 2018 ... devices subject to federal requirements, Riegel v. Medtronic,. Inc. ... Nephew, Inc. (“Smith & Nephew”), the manufacturer of his hip replacement ...... 5A Charles Alan Wright et al., Federal Practice & Procedure. § 1300 (3d ed.

www.bradley.com/insights/publications/2018/03/third-circuit-grants-express-preemption-in-hybrid-medical-device-case

Mar 6, 2018 ... On March 1, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, in Shuker et al. v. Smith & Nephew PLC, affirmed a District Court's ruling that claims ...