Case opinion for US 9th Circuit LANDRIGAN v. SCHRIRO. ... “[i]t is imperative that all relevant mitigating information be unearthed for consideration.” Caro v.
Syllabus. NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued.
SCHRIRO, DIRECTOR, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS v. ... he had instructed counsel at sentencing not to present any mitigating evidence at all.
See generally3 B.E. Witkin et al., California Criminal. Law §§ 428–429 (4th ed. 2012) .... Murray v. Schriro,. 745 F.3d 984, 997 (9th Cir. 2014) (alterations in original). (quoting Williams v. ...... People v. Tindall, 14 P.3d 207, 212 (Cal. 2000) (citing.
No. M–15. Village of Airmont, New York, et al., Petitioners v. Yitzchok ...... Dora B. Schriro, Director, Missouri Department of Corrections, et al. Petition for writ of ...
Aug 31, 2015 ... Whether the rule announced in Miller v. Alabama, 132 S. Ct. 2455 (2012), applies retroactively to cases .... Schriro v. ...... Dirron Tindal. 1979.
"By judge" feeds will show all opinions on which the named judge authored the ...... ROGER MURRAY V. DORA SCHRIRO, 08-99013, Phoenix District Court ...
Aug 25, 2003 ... Note: All undesignated references herein to the United States Code are to the 2000 edition ... et seq. is that written in chambers by an individual Justice. Page ...... Schriro; Snyder v. ...... Wayne County Friend of Court; Tindall v.
Howard Gunty Profit Sharing Plan, et al. v. Superior Court. (Greenwood) ...... Summerlin v. Schriro (9th Cir. ...... In the Matter of Tindall (Review Dept. 1991) 1 Cal.