Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heimeshoff_v._Hartford_Life_%26_Accident_Insurance_Co.

Heimeshoff v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co. No. 12–729, 567 U.S. 310 (2013) is a United States Supreme Court case. In this case, the court considered whether the agreed-upon limitations period for filing a legal objection to long- term disability denial began when the claim was filed or the claim received a final denial.

www.oyez.org/cases/2013/12-729

Oct 15, 2013 ... A case in which the Court held that the Employment Retirement Income Security Act does not mandate a statute of limitations, allowing both parties in an insurance suit to mutually agree on a timeframe in which civil suits may be brought to court.

www.leagle.com/decision/1980675381so2d2941631

Health Application Systems, Inc. (HAS) appeals an order of the trial court dismissing, with prejudice, its counterclaim against appellee, State of Florida, Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (HRS), and the third party complaint of HAS against appellee, Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company.

www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/13pdf/12-729_q8l1.pdf

Dec 16, 2013 ... Respondent Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Co. (Hartford) is the administrator of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.'s (Wal-Mart) Group Long. Term Disability Plan (Plan), an employee benefit plan covered by the. Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). The. Plan's insurance policy requires any ...