Feb 4, 2008 ... Case opinion for US 9th Circuit UNITED STATES v. JENNINGS. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw. ... Jennings' guilty pleas in both cases showed that Jennings admitted to conduct that presented a “serious potential risk of physical injury to another” within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B)(ii).
Jul 22, 2011 ... Case opinion for US 2nd Circuit UNITED STATES v. JENNINGS. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw. ... On his appeal challenging Child Pornography Judgment II, Jennings contends principally (1) that the district court should have dismissed the indictment on the ground that it was procured by his ...
Feb 25, 2010 ... In fact, this case reminds us of the circumstances we faced in McIntyre v. United States, 634 A.2d 940 (D.C.1993). In that case, we affirmed the trial court's finding that Mr. McIntyre had reinitiated the conversation with police. Id. at 944. Like appellant in this case, McIntyre was no stranger to the criminal justice ...
Case opinion for US 4th Circuit UNITED STATES v. JENNINGS. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw. ... He and his son, Larry Jennings, Jr. (Jennings Jr.), met with Morris at a restaurant that year to discuss the possibility of doing VSFP work. Jennings Jr. was a member of the HABC Board of Commissioners, which ...
Sep 15, 2008 ... Case opinion for US 7th Circuit UNITED STATES v. JENNINGS. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.
Sep 14, 2017 ... Case opinion for US 11th Circuit UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. LORENZO JENNINGS. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.
Aug 3, 2007 ... Case opinion for US 4th Circuit UNITED STATES v. JENNINGS. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw. ... II. Jennings contends first that the district court abused its discretion in admitting the hearsay statements of Karen Schmidt and Linda Columbus, passengers to whom Casey had related what had ...
Apr 29, 2010 ... II. We review jury instructions on lesser-included offenses to determine if they are supported by the evidence. Shuler v. United States, 677 A.2d 1014, 1017 (D.C. 1996). We have said that “[t]his requirement is a minimal one; it means any evidence ․ however weak.” Id. (citation and quotation marks omitted).
Apr 3, 2013 ... v. THOMAS R. JENNINGS,. Defendant-Appellant. No. 11-50315. D.C. No. 2:10-cr -00346-SJO-1. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,. Plaintiff-Appellee, v. .... II. Discussion. Defendants challenge the application of the two-level enhancement. We review the district court's interpretation of the Guidelines de novo, ...