Web Results

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Jones

United States v. Jones, 132 S.Ct. 945 (2012), was a United States Supreme Court case which held that installing a Global Positioning System (GPS) tracking ...

www.oyez.org/cases/2011/10-1259

Nov 8, 2011 ... Antoine Jones was arrested on Oct. 24, 2005, for drug possession after police attached a tracker to Jones's Jeep -- without judicial approval ...

www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/10-1259

See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. Syllabus. UNITED STATES v. JONES ...

www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/united-states-v-jones

Holding: Attaching a GPS device to a vehicle and then using the device to monitor the vehicle's movements constitutes a search under the Fourth Amendment.

epic.org/amicus/jones

EPIC also filed amicus briefs in U.S. v. Jones and State v. Earls, arguing that a warrant is required to obtain location information from cell phone subscribers.

www.eff.org/cases/us-v-jones

In United States v. Jones (at times known as United States v. Maynard), FBI agents planted a GPS device on a car while it was on private property and then used ...

www.casebriefsummary.com/united-states-v-jones

Nov 30, 2013 ... 132 S.Ct. 945 (2012). Facts. Respondent Jones was an owner and operator of a nightclub and came under suspicion of narcotics trafficking.

legaldictionary.net/united-states-v-jones

Jones. Following is the case brief for United States v. Jones, 132 S. Ct. 945 (2012 ). ... Police suspected Antoine Jones of engaging in drug-related crimes and ...

www.quimbee.com/cases/united-states-v-jones--2

A summary and case brief of United States v. Jones, including the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, key terms, and concurrences and dissents.