Did you mean: US v. Knight et al ?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._E._C._Knight_Co.

United States v. E. C. Knight Co., 156 U.S. 1 (1895), also known as the "Sugar Trust Case," was ... He continued to argue the Constitution gives Congress " authority to enact all laws necessary and proper" to regulate commerce, citing ...

www.oyez.org/cases/1850-1900/156us1

A case in which the Court found that the Sherman Anti-Trust Act was constitutional, but can only regulate interstate commerce and not intrastate commerce.

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/534/112

UNITED STATES v. KNIGHTS. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT ... Fourth Amendment analysis that considers all the circumstances of a search, ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-7th-circuit/1641316.html

Case opinion for US 7th Circuit BANK OF AMERICA v. ... United States Court of Appeals,Seventh Circuit. ... James A. KNIGHT, et al., Defendants–Appellees.

www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/156/1

This was a bill filed by the United States against E. C. Knight Company and .... Sugar Refining Co. had obtained control of all refineries in the United States ...

www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/94-1941.ZD.html

UNITED STATES, PETITIONER 94-1941 v. ... VIRGINIA, et al., PETITIONERS 94- 2107. on writs ... Rutan v. Republican Party of Ill., 497 U.S. 62, 95 (1990) (Scalia, J., ...... He is the descendant of the knight, the crusader; he is the defender of the ...

sites.gsu.edu/us-constipedia/united-states-v-e-c-knight-co-1895

United States v. E.C. Knight co. et al. Judge William Butler – Text of Opinion. Circuit Court 3rd Circuit – March 26, 1894. United States v. E.C. Knight co. et al.

www.law360.com/cases/5566415ccc4ad1516f000003

Parties, docket activity and news coverage of federal case USA v. Webb et al, case number 1:15-cr-00252, from New York Eastern Court.

openjurist.org/569/f2d/124/sherrill-v-h-knight

569 F.2d 124. 186 U.S.App.D.C. 293, 3 Media L. Rep. 1514. Robert SHERRILL v. H. Stuart KNIGHT, Director, United States Secret Service, et al., Appellants. No.