Did you mean: USA v. O'Connor ?
Web Results


United States v. O'Hagan, 521 U.S. 642 (1997), was a United States Supreme Court case concerning insider trading and breach of U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 10(b) and 10(b)-5. In an opinion written by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the Court held that an individual may be found liable for violating Rule ...


O'Connor v. Ortega, 480 U.S. 709 (1987), is a United States Supreme Court decision on the Fourth Amendment rights of government employees with regard to administrative searches in the workplace, during investigations by supervisors for violations of employee policy rather than by law enforcement for criminal offenses.


Lisa K. Osofsky, Barry R. Elden, Asst. U.S. Atty., Office of the U.S. Atty., Crim. Receiving, Appellate Div., Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff-appellee. Patrick A. Tuite, Tuite & Associates, Chicago, Ill., David S. Mejia, Oak Park, Ill., for defendant- appellant. Before POSNER and EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judges, and ESCHBACH, Senior ...


U.S. Supreme Court. O'Connor v. United States, 479 U.S. 27 (1986). O'Connor v. United States. No. 85-558. Argued Oct. 14, 1986. Decided Nov. 4, 1986*. 479 U.S. 27. Syllabus. Section 1 of Article XV of the Agreement in Implementation of Article III of the Panama Canal Treaty provides that the Panama Canal Commission ...


Oct 30, 2017 ... Darnell O'Connor pled guilty to violating 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(1), which bars felons from possessing firearms. The Government argued O'Connor's sentence should have been enhanced under section 2K2.1(a)(4)(A) of the United States Sentencing Guidelines because he had a prior felony conviction for ...


Case opinion for US Supreme Court O'CONNOR v. UNITED STATES. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.


Oct 14, 1986 ... Cite this page. APA; Bluebook; Chicago; MLA. "O'Connor v. United States." Oyez, 2 Jan. 2018, www.oyez.org/cases/1986/85-558. Legal Information Institute Cornell Law School Justia Illinois Institute of Technology. Facebook Twitter Podcast Subscribe.


"Either type of federal action," wrote Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, "would ' commandeer' state governments into the service of federal regulatory purposes, and would for this reason be inconsistent with the Constitution's division of authority between federal and state governments." This last provision violated the Tenth ...


Oct 30, 2017 ... Although Mr. O'Connor's underlying conviction was for. Hobbs Act robbery, we nevertheless must determine whether the conviction could fall within any of the enumerated offenses. See United States v. Castillo, 811 F.3d. 342, 346 (10th Cir. 2015). Because the Government contends Hobbs Act robbery fits.