Web Results


The general rule under the United States Constitution is that a valid ... search and seizure is in the court case Mapp V. Ohio.


A warrant under Rule 41(e)(2)(A) may authorize the seizure of electronic storage media or the seizure .... United States, 232 U.S. 383; Silverthorne Lumber Co. v.


In Ker v. California, the Court considered the rule of announcement as a constitutional ... Because police actions in execution of a warrant must be related to the objectives of the ... United States, 357 U.S. 493, 498–500 (1958); Gooding v.


The “exclusionary rule” requires courts to suppress evidence obtained through an unlawful search or seizure. See Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961).


Dec 28, 2010 ... The Court's reasoning for giving warrants such leeway is based on the realities of law enforcement. As it said in US v. Ventresca (1965):.


Jan 14, 2015 ... C. Exceptions to the Warrant Requirement in Cases. Involving ..... warrants used to search and seize computers, the procedures for obtaining cell ..... “legitimate” expectation of privacy. Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347, 361.


Once the Fourth Amendment applies to a particular search or seizure, the next question is under what ... for searches, seizures, and arrests conducted pursuant to a lawfully executed warrant (see Mincey v. Arizona, 437 U.S. 385 [1978]).


Aug 22, 2017 ... The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit handed down an important computer search case Friday, United States v. Griffith. ... The warrant permitted the government to seize electronic storage devices in the home.


What Police Can Search for and Seize Under a Warrant. The police can ... ( Ybarra v. Illinois, 444 U.S. 85 (1979), Michigan v. Summers, 452 U.S. 692 (1981). ) ...